Social Security Tribunal Dismisses Canada Pension Plan Retirement Pension Appeal

Citation: BW  v  [NAME] , 2026  SST  143 Social Security Tribunal of Canada General Division – Income Security Section Decision Appellant: [redacted] Respondent: [redacted] Decision under appeal: [NAME] reconsideration decision dated October 2, 2025 (issued by Service Canada) Tribunal member: [NAME] of hearing: Teleconference Hearing date: January 21, 2026 Hearing participants: Appellant Respondent Decision date: January 25, 2026 File number: GP-25-1672 On this page Decision Overview What I have to consider Matters I have to consider first Reasons for my decision Conclusion Decision [ 1 ] The appeal is dismissed. [ 2 ] The Appellant, B. W., isn’t eligible for a [NAME] ( [NAME] ) retirement pension. This decision explains why I am dismissing the appeal. Overview [ 3 ] The Appellant is retired. The date he was able to start contributing to the [NAME] was January 1966. The end of his contribution period was in 2016. Footnote 1 When the Appellant applied for a retirement pension through the [NAME] he was told that he had no earnings while working in Canada and therefore no contributions to the [NAME] . As a result, he was not entitled to a retirement pension. [ 4 ] The Appellant says that he worked in Canada between 1981 and 1995. He says that he should have contributions to the [NAME] for this period of time. Because of this, he told me that he would like to receive a pension. The Appellant also says that he worked in New Zealand for a number of years. During this time, he contributed to the [NAME]. He says that his contributions from that period should allow him to qualify for a [NAME] retirement pension. [ 5 ] The Appellant explained that while working in New Zealand he relied on others, such as accountants, to assist with filing and paying taxes. He did what others advised him to do. [ 6 ] The Minister says that it has no record of the Appellant ever having made any contributions in Canada. It has inquired if he had a name change or was able to produce any evidence of contributions. Because the Appellant has no contributions or records of contributions, he cannot qualify for a [NAME] retirement pension. What I have to consider [ 7 ] For the Appellant to succeed, he must prove that he has made contributions to the [NAME] . [ 8 ] Every employee in pensionable employment must contribute annually, through payroll deduction, an amount equal to the employee contribution rate multiplied by the lesser of their contributory wages minus the basic exemption, or their maximum contributory earnings minus any wages already subject to provincial pension plan contributions. Footnote 2 [ 9 ] A retirement pension is payable when a person has reached the age of 60 and has made contributions to the [NAME] any time since the start of the plan in January 1966 and within their contributory period. Footnote 3 Matters I have to consider first The Appellant cannot use his contributions in New Zealand to obtain a retirement pension [ 10 ] There is an agreement between Canada and New Zealand called the International Social Security Agreement (ISSA). This agreement ensures eligibility for Canadians even if Canadian contributions alone are insufficient for the calculation of a [NAME] benefit. In other words, the ISSA may assist in establishing that a person may receive a benefit. However, the benefit amount is then calculated using only the person’s Canadian earnings. Footnote 4 [ 11 ] Importantly, the ISSA is specific to [NAME] benefits that have a minimum qualifying period. Retirement pensions unlike other forms of benefits available through the [NAME] does not have a minimum qualifying period. This is because all amounts contributed to the pension plan are used to establish the resulting retirement pension. [ 12 ] Unfortunately for the Appellant the ISSA cannot be used to assist in providing him with a benefit because it does not allow his contributions in New Zealand to be used to calculate his retirement pension in Canada. Reasons for my decision [ 13 ] In reviewing the Appellant’s record of earnings, it is evident that he has made no contributions to the [NAME] . Footnote 5 The predicate for obtaining a [NAME] retirement pension is that you must have made some amount of valid contributions to the [NAME] throughout the period you are entitled to do so. Generally this is from age 18 to age 70. In the Appellant’s case, the time was more limited as the [NAME] came into effect in 1966. [ 14 ] Without valid contributions, the [NAME] cannot issue a retirement pension. This is because you must be a contributor in order to qualify for a payment. As the Appellant never contributed to the [NAME] he is not a contributor. Conclusion [ 15 ] I find that the Appellant isn’t eligible for a [NAME] retirement pension [ 16 ] This means the appeal is dismissed. Footnotes Footnote 1 GD2-21 Return to footnote 1 referrer Footnote 2 Section 8(1)(a)(b) [NAME] to footnote 2 referrer Footnote 3 Section 44(1)(a) [NAME] to footnote 3 referrer Footnote 4 Agreement on Social Security Between Canada and New Zealand, Article XI Proclamation Declaring the Agreement on Social Security Between Canada and New Zealand in Force May 1, 1997 Return to footnote 4 referrer Footnote 5 GD5-2-3 Return to footnote 5 referrer