VadeLab
DismissedCivil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims·

Tenant Loses Claim for Security Deposit Return

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant asked for the return of a $950 deposit but lost the case. The tribunal ruled that the deposit was meant to be used as the last month's rent, not as a refundable security deposit.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is not entitled to the return of a deposit if the agreement specifies that the deposit will be used as the last month's rent.

Topics

security depositsrental agreementssmall claims

Provisions

Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 47

📖 Technical summary

The Civil Resolution Tribunal dismissed the claimant's request for the return of a deposit, finding that the deposit was to be used as the last month's rent.

📚 Full judgment

The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.

⚖️ View on the official court website ↗

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The deposit was agreed to be used as the last month's rent.
  • The applicant agreed to the terms regarding the deposit usage.
  • The respondent's statements about the deposit being used as rent were accepted as part of the agreement.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The applicant claimed he was entitled to the return of the deposit.
  • The applicant did not provide any documentary evidence to support his claim.
  • The applicant did not dispute the respondent's interpretation of the deposit agreement.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about whether a tenant was entitled to the return of a $950 deposit after moving out.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 47 was applied.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the tenant who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should carefully review their rental agreement to understand how their deposit will be handled.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Messages between the tenant and landlord specifying the use of the deposit as the last month's rent mattered.

Official source: Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims (© Province of British Columbia). VadeLab reproduces no part of the decision text; the summary above is VadeLab's own material. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.
Tenant's Claim for Deposit Refund Dismissed - Civil | VadeLab