Allowed
Tenant Wins Unpaid Rent and Cleaning Fees from Former Roommate
Case No.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to recover unpaid rent and cleaning fees from a former roommate.
📚 Full judgment
The summary, holding and questions above are VadeLab’s own material. The official decision itself is published by the court, and we do not reproduce it on this page.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant provided evidence of the signed agreement requiring 30 days' notice for moving out.
- The tenant proved that the former roommate did not provide proper notice and thus owed rent for November and December.
- The tenant acknowledged owing $82.18 but argued it should be deducted from the security deposit.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The former roommate claimed a text message agreement waived all rent except for the utility bill, which was dismissed by the court.
- The former roommate argued that only his room needed cleaning and thus he shouldn't pay any fees, but evidence showed both rooms were cleaned.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancy Act (BC), s. 47 was applied.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the claimant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they provide proper notice and pay any outstanding rent and cleaning fees before vacating the premises.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The signed agreement between the parties and the text messages exchanged between them mattered.
Official source: Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims — this page does not reproduce the decision; it links to the court's own publication. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Civil Resolution Tribunal (British Columbia) — Small Claims (© Province of British Columbia). VadeLab reproduces no part of the decision text; the summary above is VadeLab's own material. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.