Section 583 — Criminal Code: Certain omissions not grounds for objection

No count in an indictment is insufficient by reason of the absence of details where, in the opinion of the court, the count otherwise fulfils the requirements of section 581 and, without restricting the generality of the foregoing, no count in an indictment is insufficient by reason only that it does not name the person injured or intended or attempted to be injured; it does not name the person who owns or has a special property or interest in property mentioned in the count; it charges an intent to defraud without naming or describing the person whom it was intended to defraud; it does not set out any writing that is the subject of the charge; it does not set out the words used where words that are alleged to have been used are the subject of the charge; it does not specify the means by which the alleged offence was committed; it does not name or describe with precision any person, place or thing; or it does not, where the consent of a person, official or authority is required before proceedings may be instituted for an offence, state that the consent has been obtained.