VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tribunal awards $858.00 for rent arrears in Auckland

Case No. [2026] NZTT 5503647 · Adjudicator H Ben Fayed

📌 In brief

In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $858 in rent arrears and filing fees. The tribunal also noted that since the property had been vacated before the hearing, a possession order was unnecessary.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is required to pay rent arrears if the property has been vacated after the due date for payment.

Topics

rent arrearspossession orders

📖 Technical summary

The claimant was awarded rent arrears and filing fees, but a possession order was not granted as it was no longer necessary.

📜 Headnote Official document

The claimant sought rent arrears and a possession order. The tribunal awarded the claimant $858 for rent arrears and filing fees, but did not grant a possession order as it was no longer necessary.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5503647 1

[2026] NZTT 5503647

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] must pay [APPELLANT] $858.00 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

2. The [COMPANY] is to pay the bond of $2,480.00 (6442966-008) to [APPELLANT] immediately.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 29/05/2026 $3,310.00 Filing fee reimbursement $28.00 Total award $3,338.00 Bond $2,480.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $858.00

Reasons:

1. Both parties attended the hearing.

2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears to the 29th of May 2026. She tells me that on the 8th of May at an inspection her representative found the house to have been vacated. She is seeking rent arrears 21 days from this date and has

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5503647 2

provided records showing the amount owing for this period. I am satisfied this record is correct.

3. The landlord is also seeking a possession order. From what the applicant has told me, possession has already been surrendered by the respondent from at least the 8th of May 2026. As such a possession order is redundant.

4. Because the applicant has been successful in their application, I have awarded the application filing fee.

[NAME] 09 June 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5503647 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5503647 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant vacates property after due date for rent payment.
  • Tenant agrees to pay arrears and comply with conditions set by the Tribunal.
  • Tenant terminates tenancy without paying in advance as agreed.
  • Significant rent arrears require tenant to vacate premises and pay outstanding rent.
  • Landlord provides sufficient evidence to support claims.
  • Rent at least 21 days in arrears when application for termination is filed.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal decided that the tenant must pay the landlord $858.00 for rent arrears up to May 29, 2026.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about the tenant owing rent arrears up to May 29, 2026.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided in favour of the landlord based on the records provided, which showed the amount owed for the period in question.

Which laws or rules were applied?

No specific laws or rules were mentioned in the judgment.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the accuracy of the records provided by the landlord, which showed the amount owed for the period in question.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

For someone in a similar situation, it means that they should ensure accurate record-keeping of rent payments and arrears.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The evidence that mattered was the records provided by the landlord, which showed the amount owed for the period in question.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.