Tenant Must Pay $1,924 in Rent Arrears and Damages
📌 In brief
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled in favour of a landlord who sought rent arrears and damages from a tenant. The tenant was ordered to pay $1,924 for unpaid rent, pest control costs, and property repairs due to damage caused during the tenancy.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is responsible for rent arrears, pest control costs, and property damage beyond fair wear and tear.
📖 What the law says
This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean, and leaving the premises tidy and free of rubbish when moving out. In this case, the tenant was found to have not met these obligations, leading to rent arrears and costs for cleaning and repairs.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant successfully recovered rent arrears and damages from the respondent.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears of $165.71, pest control costs of $517.50, and property repair costs totaling $2,843.90, after finding that the tenant failed to comply with obligations at the end of tenancy and caused damage beyond fair wear and tear.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407348 1
[2026] NZTT 5407348
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA
APPLICANT: [redacted] [APPELLANT]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. [RESPONDENT] must pay [COMPANY] [NAME] [COMPANY] $1,924.09 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.
2. The Bond Centre is to pay the bond of $2,880.00 (6539103-009) to [COMPANY] [NAME] [APPELLANT] immediately.
Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears $165.71 Pest control: Cockroaches and fleas $517.50 Lock/key replacement: Remotes $138.00 Replace furnishings: Curtains/rack/ties $731.40 Repairs: Deck $552.00 Bedroom 1. Carpet replacement and wall repair $788.00 Bedroom 2. Repair door frame, replace missing latch, install curtain rod
$575.00
Bedroom 3. Carpet replacement and wall repairs $1,317.00 Tenant credit $100.52 Replace kitchen bins $92.00 Filing fee reimbursement $28.00 Total award $4,904.61 $100.52 Net award $4,804.09 Bond $2,880.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $1,924.09
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407348 2
Reasons:
1. The landlord attended the hearing, set down to be conducted via video conference. There was no entry into the conference by the tenant, nor any call in to the conference by one of the telephone numbers provided on the Notice of Hearing. I was satisfied adequate service had completed and I continued with the hearing.
2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears, compensation, refund of the bond, and reimbursement of the filing fee following the end of the tenancy.
How much is owed for rent?
3. The tenancy ended on 30 November 2025 after tenant notice. The landlord provided rent records which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy.
4. A tenant credit of $100.52 was noted and it is applied against the debt in this order.
Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?
5. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
6. The tenant did not leave the premises free from pests. A significant cockroach and flea infestation was found at the end of the tenancy. Photos provided support the invoice treatment and cleaning costs of $517.50.
7. The tenant did not return the two gate remotes as provided. These were replaced at a cost of $138.00.
8. The two kitchen bins were missing at the end of the tenancy and had to be replaced at a cost of $92.00.
9. The amounts ordered are proved.
Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
10. A landlord must prove that damage to the premises occurred during the tenancy and is more than fair wear and tear. If this is established, to avoid liability, the tenant must prove they did not carelessly or intentionally cause or permit the
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407348 3
damage. Tenants are liable for the actions of people at the premises with their permission. See sections 40(2)(a), 41 and 49B RTA.
11. Where the damage is caused carelessly, and is covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to the lesser of the insurance excess or four weeks' rent (or four weeks' market rent in the case of a tenant paying income-related rent). See section 49B(3)(a) RTA.
12. Where the damage is careless and is not covered by the landlord's insurance, the tenant's liability is limited to four weeks' rent (or market rent). See section 49B(3)(b) RTA. Where insurance money is irrecoverable because of the tenant's conduct, the property is treated as if it is not insured against the damage. See section 49B(3A)(a) RTA. The excess recorded in the tenancy agreement was $650.00 and that has been adopted in this order as appropriate.
13. Tenants are liable for the cost of repairing damage that is intentional or which results from any activity at the premises that is an imprisonable offence. This applies to anything the tenant does and anything done by a person they are responsible for. See section 49B(1) RTA.
14. Damage is intentional where a person intends to cause damage and takes the necessary steps to achieve that purpose. Damage is also intentional where a person does something, or allows a situation to continue, knowing that damage is a certainty. [NAME] v Korck [2019] NZHC 1541.
15. The following damage was caused during the tenancy. All claims were supported by entry and exit photos:
Replace furnishings: Curtains/rack/ties
16. The lounge curtain was stained beyond cleaning and replaced. A curtain rod was removed from bedroom 2. A net curtain was damaged and required replacement. These claims are proven and awarded in full.
Repairs: Deck
17. The wooden external deck and entrance steps had paint on them as well as drawings and painting. It required repair and re-staining at the invoiced cost as awarded.
Bedroom 1. Carpet replacement and wall repair
18. Photos confirmed the carpet was badly stained and required replacement. The walls had some damage from fixtures once removed. The claim and costs are accepted but the carpet is compensated at the insurance excess level.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407348 4
Bedroom 2. Repair door frame, replace missing latch, install curtain rod
19. The door frame was damaged by what appears a forced entry. One piece of the frame and the lock plate required replacement. The replacement curtain rod labour cost, as well as the cost of replacing a window latch, are awarded per the invoiced costs.
Bedroom 3. Carpet replacement and wall repair
20. Photos confirmed the carpet was badly stained and required replacement. The walls had several areas of damage. One small hole in the plasterboard required repair and large wall drawing had to be removed and repainted. This bedroom was in the worst condition of the three.
21. The damage above is more than fair wear and tear, and the tenant has not disproved liability for the damage.
22. The amounts ordered are proved.
23. The claims for the wardrobe door repairs in bedrooms 2 and 3 are dismissed as unproven. While invoiced, no photos show any damage that support the claimed tasks.
24. The two carpet replacement costs of $747.50 ($650 ex GST) are reduced to the lower excess liability of $650.00 each.
25. The premises was new at commencement. I have not applied any depreciation.
Filing fee
26. [COMPANY] [NAME] [COMPANY] has substantially succeeded with the claim I have reimbursed the filing fee.
[NAME] [NAME]
29 May 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407348 5
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5407348 6
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons: How much is owed for rent? Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy? Is the tenant responsible for the damage to the premises?
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Wins Bond Refund Against Landlord’s Claims
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Current Rent
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant's Tenancy Terminated Due to Rent Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Orders Tenant to Pay Arrears and Rates
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay $2818.44 for Damage and Cleaning
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Terminated Due to Tenant’s Absence at Hearing
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Rules Tenant Must Keep Property Clean and Register Pets
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Landlord $3,519.97 for Rent Arrears and Damage
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay $2,875 in Vacated Costs After Moving Out
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Return Bond
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenant compliance with payment obligations and conditions set by the landlord.
- Tenant responsibility for leaving premises reasonably clean, tidy, and without damage beyond fair wear and tear.
- Tenant liability for rent arrears and utility charges.
- Tenant's adherence to Residential Tenancies Act 1986 regarding bond refunds and fixed costs not attributable to their occupation.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tenancy Tribunal ruled that the tenant must pay rent arrears and damages to the landlord.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute over unpaid rent and property damage.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on evidence of unpaid rent and documented property damage beyond fair wear and tear.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 40(2)(a) and 49B of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The landlord's evidence of unpaid rent and property damage beyond fair wear and tear was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure they comply with their obligations at the end of tenancy and avoid causing damage beyond fair wear and tear.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Rent records, photos of property condition, and invoices for repairs were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can appeal within 10 working days to the District Court.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for such cases.
