VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay $1,160.41 in Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs

Case No. [2026] NZTT 5413930

📌 In brief

In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal ruled that a tenant must pay the landlord $1,160.41 for unpaid rent and cleaning costs because the tenant did not leave the premises clean or remove rubbish as required by law.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is required to leave premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return keys and security devices, and leave chattels provided for their benefit upon termination of a tenancy agreement.

Topics

rent arrearscleaning costs

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Residential Tenancies Act 1986 s.40

This section outlines a tenant's responsibilities, including paying rent on time, keeping the property reasonably clean and tidy, and notifying the landlord of any damage or needed repairs. When a tenancy ends, the tenant must move out, remove all their belongings, leave the property reasonably clean and tidy, and take out all rubbish.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a lawyer.

📖 Technical summary

The claimant was awarded damages for rent arrears and cleaning costs due to the respondent's failure to comply with tenancy obligations.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $1,160.41 for rent arrears and cleaning expenses due to the tenant's failure to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy agreement.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5413930 1

[2026] NZTT 5413930

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: Unit/[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [RESPONDENT] must pay [APPELLANT] [NAME] $1,160.41 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears $167.68 Cleaning: House $200.00 Oven/stove cleaning $165.86 Cleaning: Kitchen $52.13 Rubbish removal $574.74 Total award $1,160.41 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $1,160.41

Reasons:

1. The landlord attended the hearing. The tenant did not appear and was telephoned on the number provided in the application form, but there was no answer.

2. The landlord has applied for rent arrears and compensation following the end of the tenancy.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5413930 2

How much is owed for rent ?

3. The tenancy began on 15 August 2024 and ended on 17 October 2025. The landlord provided rent records to the end of the tenancy which prove the amount owing at the end of the tenancy.

Did the tenant comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy?

4. At the end of the tenancy the tenant must leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy, remove all rubbish, return all keys and security devices, and leave all chattels provided for their benefit. See section 40(1)(e)(ii)-(v) Residential Tenancies Act 1986.

5. The tenant did not leave the premises reasonably clean and tidy and did not remove all rubbish.

6. There were a lot of items left inside the premises being a lot of clothes and small household items in the kitchen drawers, also a chair ,and a cot and a set clothes drawers in a wardrobe. This amount is awarded as claimed.

7. The photographs provided did not support the amount claimed for cleaning the whole house. It was established that the tenant had left many items behind, and the landlord said that this showed that they had not tried to clean. The requirement is that the premises were not left reasonably clean, not that an attempt had been made.

8. The oven required cleaning and again the kitchen drawers and cupboards showed items left but no substantial cleaning required.

9. The amounts ordered reflect the evidence provided.

[NAME]

29 May 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5413930 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit [NAME]/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.[NAME] https://www.[NAME] http://www.[NAME]

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5413930 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant returns the property in a reasonably clean and tidy state.
  • Tenant complies with payment terms set by the Tenancy Tribunal.
  • Landlord is entitled to dispose of abandoned goods after giving reasonable notice.
  • Tenant does not abandon the premises without reasonable excuse.
  • Landlord provides robust documentary evidence for claims.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tenant was ordered to pay the landlord $1,160.41 for rent arrears and cleaning costs.

Who was involved?

A landlord and a tenant were involved in the dispute.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided that the tenant must pay because they failed to comply with their obligations at the end of the tenancy agreement.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 40(1)(e) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's failure to leave the premises clean and remove rubbish at the end of the tenancy agreement.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It was in favour of the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants must ensure they leave premises clean and remove all rubbish when ending a tenancy agreement to avoid penalties.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Rent records, photographs of the property condition, and statements from both parties were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, but only if there is new evidence or substantial wrong in the process.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It's advisable to seek legal advice for specific guidance on your situation.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.