Tribunal Denies Landlord’s Expedited Abandonment Request
📌 In brief
A landlord's request to terminate a tenant's lease quickly due to suspected abandonment was denied because it appeared the tenant had simply moved out with proper notice and left keys behind, not abandoning the property without reason. A full court hearing is now scheduled.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord cannot use the expedited process if there are indications that the tenancy has ended by notice rather than abandonment without reasonable excuse.
📖 Technical summary
The claimant's application for expedited abandonment was declined, and a full hearing is scheduled.
📜 Headnote Official document
The claimant applied for termination of the tenancy through an expedited abandonment process, but the tribunal declined the application as there were indications that the tenancy had ended by notice rather than abandonment. The matter is referred to Tenancy Services for a full hearing.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Dismissed
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5514236 1
[2026] NZTT 5514236
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. The application for termination under the expedited abandonment process is not granted.
2. The application is referred to Tenancy Services for a full hearing to be scheduled.
Reasons:
1. The landlord has applied for termination of the tenancy for abandonment through the expedited process under section 91AA Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
Are there grounds for an expedited application?
2. The two requirements for the expedited process are:
a. The tenant does not want to contest the abandonment application.
b. The information provided by the landlord with the application is sufficient to enable the Tribunal to determine it properly without a hearing (either on the basis of the information alone or with only minor clarifications).
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5514236 2
3. If the requirements for the expedited process are met, the Tribunal may terminate the tenancy where the premises have been abandoned and rent is in arrear at the hearing date. See section 61 Residential Tenancies Act 1986. A tenancy is abandoned where the tenant leaves the premises without reasonable excuse, not intending to return or to meet their obligations, and fails to notify the landlord.
4. The landlord says the tenant sent a text message on the 24 May saying that he moved house, and he will meet the landlord on 25 May to give them the keys. The landlord went to the property on the 25 May at 4pm as per agreement but the tenant did not show up. The premises are empty (photographs provided).
5. It therefore appears that the tenancy has ended by notice, the tenant is no longer occupying the premises, and the landlord already has possession.
6. The expedited process for termination under the abandonment process is not appropriate in these circumstances.
7. I decline to grant the application and this matter will be scheduled for a full hearing as soon as possible.
8. If the landlord wishes to withdraw this application, they must notify Tenancy Services as soon as possible so that the hearing date may be vacated.
A [NAME] 01 June 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5514236 3
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit [NAME]/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.[NAME] https://www.[NAME] http://www.[NAME]
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5514236 4
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: [NAME]/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant's Tenancy Terminated for Rent Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant’s Abandoned Property Can Be Disposed Of By Landlord, Says Tenancy Tr…
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Current Rent
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant's Tenancy Terminated for Abandonment and Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Terminated for Tenant’s Abandonment and Rent Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Orders Tenant to Pay Rent and Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay $1,160.41 in Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Arrears and Vacate Property
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Ordered to Pay Landlord Over $2,000 for Rent Arrears
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- A tenant must comply with payment terms set by the Tenancy Tribunal to avoid immediate eviction.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- A landlord must provide robust documentary evidence for an expedited abandonment process under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
- A landlord seeking expedited abandonment must provide robust documentary evidence to substantiate the claim under section 91AA RTA.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal rejected the landlord's request to terminate the tenancy through an expedited abandonment process.
Who was involved?
A landlord and tenants were involved in a dispute over the termination of a lease agreement.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided against the landlord because it appeared that the tenant had left with proper notice rather than abandoning the property without reason.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Section 91AA of the Residential Tenancies Act 1986 was considered in making this decision.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The key reasoning was that there were indications that the tenancy had ended by notice rather than abandonment without reasonable excuse.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was against the landlord, as their application was denied.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
If a tenant leaves with proper notice and returns keys, landlords cannot use the expedited abandonment process to terminate the tenancy.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of an empty property were provided by the landlord.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, both parties can appeal within 10 working days using the appropriate forms.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for such cases.
