VadeLab
AllowedTenancy Tribunal·

Tenant Ordered to Pay Landlord $2,627 in Rent Arrears and Damage Costs

Case No. [2026] NZTT 5469490 · Adjudicator N Blake

📌 In brief

In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay the landlord $2,627 for rent arrears and repairs to a broken window that occurred during their tenancy. The tenant did not attend the hearing, and the claimant provided evidence of non-payment and property damage.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is liable to pay rent arrears and damages beyond fair wear and tear.

Topics

rent arrearswindow damage

📖 Technical summary

The claimant was awarded arrears and damages for window repairs.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tenancy Tribunal awarded the landlord rent arrears and damages for a broken window beyond fair wear and tear. The tenant did not appear at the hearing, and the claimant provided evidence of non-payment and property damage.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5469490 1

[2026] NZTT 5469490

TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT REMOTE LOCATION | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA

APPLICANT: [redacted]

Landlord

RESPONDENT: [redacted]

Tenant

TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

ORDER

1. [RESPONDENT] and [RESPONDENT] must pay [APPELLANT] $2,627.00 immediately, calculated as shown in table below.

Description Landlord Tenant Rent arrears to 9 May 2025 $2,300.00 Window repairs $299.00 Filing fee reimbursement $28.00 Total award $2,627.00 Total payable by Tenant to Landlord $2,627.00

Reasons:

1. The tenancy began on 7 December 2025.

2. The agreement required the tenants to pay a bond and two weeks’ rent in advance.

3. The tenants moved in without making those payments.

4. Rent payments were somewhat sporadic during the tenancy.

5. The tenants gave notice and the tenancy ended on 9 May 2026.

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5469490 2

6. The landlord’s application seeks rent arrears and the cost of re-glazing a broken window.

7. The hearing took place by phone on 2 June 2026. The landlord participated in the hearing. I was unable to contact the tenants on the phone numbers provided.

8. The landlord provided a detailed timeline of the tenancy.

9. The claim for rent arrears is proven.

10. The landlord provided a photograph of the broken window and an invoice for the re-glazing cost. I am satisfied that the damage happened during this tenancy. The damage is beyond fair wear and tear. The re-glazing cost is proven.

11. The landlord has been successful in this application and I must also award him the filing fee of $28.00.

N [NAME]

02 June 2026

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5469490 3

Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.

Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the adjudicator improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.

You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf

Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals

Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is

less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the

work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.

Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.

Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.

If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].

Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.

https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/

__________________________________________________________________________________ 5469490 4

A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].

Reasons:

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Tenant failed to attend a hearing.
  • Significant rent arrears exceeding 21 days when the application is filed.
  • Tenant stopped paying rent and abandoned the property.
  • Tenant did not comply with rental agreements or payment orders within the specified period.
  • Procedural uncertainty due to an appeal on a previous decision led to an adjournment.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tenancy Tribunal ordered the tenant to pay rent arrears and damages for a broken window.

Who was involved?

A landlord and two tenants were involved in this dispute over rental payments and property damage.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on evidence provided by the landlord showing rent arrears and damages beyond fair wear and tear.

Which laws or rules were applied?

No specific laws were cited in this decision.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord's evidence of non-payment and property damage was crucial to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the landlord, who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants should ensure they make timely rent payments and avoid causing damage beyond fair wear and tear to their rental property.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The landlord provided a timeline of non-payment, photographs of the broken window, and an invoice for repairs.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal within 10 working days to the District Court.

Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for specific guidance on your situation.

Official source: Tenancy Tribunal headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.