Tenant's Failure to Return Constitutes Abandonment
📌 In brief
In this case, the Tenancy Tribunal decided to terminate the tenancy because the tenant did not return to the property as agreed and left rent unpaid. The landlord was granted possession of the premises due to abandonment and arrears.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant's failure to return to premises after arranging a meeting for handover constitutes abandonment under the Residential Tenancies Act 1986.
📖 Technical summary
The tenancy was terminated due to abandonment and rent arrears.
📜 Headnote Official document
The tenancy was terminated due to abandonment and rent arrears. The tenant failed to return after arranging a meeting for handover, leading the Tribunal to conclude that the tenancy had been abandoned.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5502170 1
[2026] NZTT 5502170
TENANCY TRIBUNAL AT QUEENSTOWN | TE TARAIPIUNARA RETIHANGA KI TĀHUNA
APPLICANT: [redacted]
Landlord
RESPONDENT: [redacted]
Tenant
TENANCY ADDRESS: [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
ORDER
1. The tenancy of [RESPONDENT] at [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] is terminated, and possession is granted to Sri & [APPELLANT] at 1pm on Thursday 4 June 2026.
2. [RESPONDENT] is to pay $3,200, being rent arrears to 10 May 2026, to Sri & [APPELLANT] [COMPANY] from the bond.
3. The [COMPANY] is to pay the bond of $3,200.00 (BN-25096228) to Sri & [APPELLANT] immediately.
4. The hearing is adjourned.
5. Two hours will be allowed for the next hearing of this application, scheduled before me on the next available date to be conducted by video conference.
6. The landlord’s remaining claims are for removal of the tenant’s belongings and rubbish, cleaning, repairing damage, a garage remote and lock changing and further rent arrears.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5502170 2
Reasons:
1. Only the landlord’s representative attended the hearing.
2. The landlord applied for termination of the tenancy for abandonment, rent arrears and payment of the bond.
3. The landlord’s application for expedited abandonment was unsuccessful and so the application was referred for hearing. The Tribunal’s order notes that the parties were communicating about ending the tenancy and they were discussing meeting at the premises for the tenant to remove her belongings. The [NAME] took the view that this was not clearly an abandonment, although it could be a breach of the fixed term tenancy agreement.
4. The Tribunal may terminate the tenancy where the premises have been abandoned and rent is in arrear at the hearing date. A tenancy is abandoned where the tenant leaves the premises without reasonable excuse, not intending to return or to meet their obligations.
5. The fixed term tenancy agreement was due to end on 14 December 2026.
6. Rent fell into arrears and the landlord informed the tenant that it wanted possession of the premises.
7. The tenant informed the landlord that she could not remain in the premises because she could not afford to pay the rent.
8. The parties arranged to meet at the premises on 6 May for the tenant to remove her belongings and clean the premises and to hand possession to the landlord. The landlord attended but the tenant did not.
9. The landlord then informed the tenant that he would be at the premises on 10 May for the handover. But the tenant did not attend.
10. Despite the landlord’s attempts to contact the tenant, there was no more communication from her.
11. The landlord spoke with Tenancy Services who advised him that he could not take possession of the premises unless the tenant had agreed to it.
12. The view I take of this is that there was no clear agreement that the tenant was giving or has given possession of the premises to the landlord. Her belongings were still in the premises and there was meant to be a meeting at the premises when the tenant would remove her belongings and hand over possession of the premises to the landlord. That did not happen.
13. The landlord tried to obtain written conformation from the tenant that he could take back possession, but it was not forthcoming.
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5502170 3
14. In these circumstances I find that tenant has abandoned the premises. Rent is in arrear and therefore the tenancy has been terminated immediately.
15. The landlord provided rent records which show that rent arrears to 10 May are $3,200. The landlord claims rent arrears beyond that date at least to the day of the hearing and possibly beyond. At this stage I have ordered payment of the $3,200 due to 10 May and for the bond in that sum to be paid to the landlord.
16. The landlord has other, end-of-tenancy, claims but they have not been finalised because the landlord has not had possession of the premises. I have therefore adjourned the application so that those claims can be finalised and dealt with at another hearing together with the claim for further rent arrears.
17. The parties will be notified in writing by Tenancy Services of the date and time of the next hearing.
[NAME]
05 June 2026
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5502170 4
Please read carefully: Visit justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals for more information on rehearings and appeals.
Rehearings You can apply for a rehearing if you believe that a substantial wrong or miscarriage of justice has happened. For example: • you did not get the letter telling you the date of the hearing, or • the [NAME] improperly admitted or rejected evidence, or • new evidence, relating to the original application, has become available.
You must give reasons and evidence to support your application for a rehearing. A rehearing will not be granted just because you disagree with the decision. You must apply within five working days of the decision using the Application for Rehearing form: justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf
Right of Appeal Both the landlord and the tenant can file an appeal. You should file your appeal at the District Court where the original hearing took place. The cost for an appeal is $260. You must apply within 10 working days after the decision is issued using this Appeal to the District Court form: justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals
Grounds for an appeal You can appeal if you think the decision was wrong, but not because you don’t like the decision. For some cases, there’ll be no right to appeal. For example, you can’t appeal: • against an interim order • a final order, or the failure to make an order, where the amount in dispute on appeal is
less than $1000 • a final order to undertake work, or the failure to make an order, where the value of the
work in dispute on appeal is less than $1000.
Enforcement Where the Tribunal made an order about money or property this is called a civil debt. The Ministry of Justice Collections Team can assist with enforcing civil debt. You can contact the collections team on [PHONE] or go to justice.govt.nz/fines/civil-debt for forms and information.
Notice to a party ordered to pay money or vacate premises, etc. Failure to comply with any order may result in substantial additional costs for enforcement. It may also involve being ordered to appear in the District Court for an examination of your means or seizure of your property.
If you require further help or information regarding this matter, visit tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing- decisions or phone Tenancy Services on [PHONE].
Mēna ka hiahia koe ki ētahi atu awhina, kōrero ranei mo tēnei take, haere ki tenei ipurangi tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, waea atu ki Ratonga Takirua ma runga [PHONE] ranei.
https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals https://www.justice.govt.nz/assets/Documents/Forms/TT-Application-for-rehearing.pdf https://www.justice.govt.nz/tribunals/tenancy/rehearings-appeals/ https://www.justice.govt.nz/fines/about-civil-debt/ https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions https://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions http://www.tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions/
__________________________________________________________________________________ 5502170 5
A manaomia nisi faamatalaga poo se fesoasoani, e uiga i lau mataupu, asiasi ifo le matou aupega tafailagi: tenancy.govt.nz/disputes/enforcing-decisions, pe fesootai mai le Tenancy Services i le numera [PHONE].
Reasons:
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Terminated Due to Rent Arrears
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Rules: Tenant Must Clean Premises Before Leaving
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenancy Tribunal Orders Tenant to Pay Rent Arrears and Damages
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenants Ordered to Pay Rent Arrears and Cleaning Costs
- Tenancy Tribunal Claimant wins rent dispute: Tenant ordered to pay $7,856.15
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant Must Pay Rent Arrears or Face Eviction
- Tenancy Tribunal Tenant's Non-Appearance Leads to Landlord's Possession Order
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Tenant pays required rent arrears and ongoing rent to avoid tenancy termination.
- Tenant leaves premises clean, removing all rubbish upon lease end.
- Landlord entitled to possession if tenant fails to attend hearing after valid notice.
- Tenant responsible for damages beyond fair wear and tear.
- Tenant can recover unpaid rent with proper evidence.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Claim dismissed if landlord lacks robust documentary proof of abandonment.
- Tribunal does not rehear cases where tenants fail to attend or provide grounds for delay.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tenancy was terminated due to abandonment and unpaid rent.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the termination of a rental agreement.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided that the tenant had abandoned the premises by not returning after arranging to meet with the landlord for handover.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Residential Tenancies Act 1986 was cited as relevant legislation.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tenant's failure to return and arrange a meeting for handover was key in establishing abandonment.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the landlord, who initiated the termination process.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
If a tenant fails to return after arranging a meeting and leaves rent unpaid, they risk having their tenancy terminated.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Rent records showing arrears were important, as well as communication between the parties about the handover.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions can be appealed to the District Court within 10 working days of issuance.
Is it worth getting a lawyer for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified lawyer for such cases.
