
Information Rights & Regulatory judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided that an operator could obtain rights over unoccupied land through an agreement imposed by the tribunal due to lack of response from a person. The decision was based on the Electronic Communications Code and relevant regulations.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a decision regarding the Freedom of Information Act 2000, finding errors in the application of the public interest test. The case was remitted to the First-tier Tribunal for re-hearing.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal challenging the refusal of an operator's licence due to incomplete application. The appeal was dismissed because the applicant did not provide all necessary information and met all requirements set by the Act.
The Upper Tribunal dismissed an appeal where an operator and its managers challenged the Traffic Commissioner's decision to revoke their licence and disqualify them as managers. The Tribunal found that the operator had lost good repute due to serious regulatory breaches, including vehicle maintenance failures and inadequate management oversight.
The Upper Tribunal allowed an appeal against a Traffic Commissioner's decision to revoke a a person's licence. The Tribunal ruled that the Commissioner made a mistake in interpreting a a person’s report, leading to an incorrect decision to revoke the licence.
A local authority issued financial and monetary penalties against an individual who is also a director of a a person management company. However, the First-tier Tribunal quashed these penalties because the notices were unclear about whether they targeted the individual or their company.
The Upper Tribunal decided that requests for internal evaluations of university research centres should be handled under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), not the Environmental Information Regulations (EIR).
In this case, an individual brought a series of claims against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) and others for alleged breaches of discrimination laws. The Employment Tribunal dismissed these complaints as having no reasonable chance of proving that the SRA's actions were discriminatory under the Equality Act 2010.
The Upper Tribunal upheld the revocation of a transport company's licence because the company failed to designate a qualified transport manager by the deadline, despite multiple warnings.
The Upper Tribunal ruled that confirming or denying whether legal advice was sought on the lawfulness of the 2020 lockdown would reveal a person covered by legal advice privilege, overturning the First-tier Tribunal's decision.