
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that the tenant was in breach of covenant for Flat 11 but not for Flat 9. The tenant was ordered to pay service charges and costs for Flat 11 but not for Flat 9.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled that the service charges for a person should stay at 25% according to their lease agreement. The decision was based on the terms of the lease and the lack of explicit provisions requiring a different apportionment.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the tenant occupies telecommunications sites as tenants at will, not a person tenants, under the Electronic Communications Code. This means the tenant's occupation is not secured by a a person tenancy but rather by an ongoing negotiation process.
The Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a property, considering factors like the property's condition and market comparables. The decision was made by Mr N. a person FRICS on 25 June 2025.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that tenants were entitled to manage their properties, the address and the address, because these buildings met the legal definition of being self-contained under the 2002 Act.
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy at £670 per month, excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in paragraphs 3 & 4 of the judgment. The decision also addresses service charges and repair responsibilities under Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a rented property. They considered the property's condition and market comparables, setting the fair rent at £175 per week, effective from 24 June 2025.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent for a tenant's property, setting the rent at £307.00 per week after considering factors like the property's condition and its proximity to construction sites.
The Tribunal decided on a market rent of £1350 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy. The decision was based on the rental evidence provided by the tenant and the Tribunal's assessment of local rental values.
The First-tier Tribunal rejected a tenant's request for a rent repayment order because the tenant was also the landlord's managing agent and failed to inform the landlord about a new licensing requirement. The Tribunal decided not to make a rent repayment order, considering the tenant's breach of duty.