VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal sets rent for assured periodic tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy at £670 per month, excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in paragraphs 3 & 4 of the judgment. The decision also addresses service charges and repair responsibilities under Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, as applied in this specific case involving a 2-bedroom terrace property.

Topics

rent determinationassured periodic tenancy

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £670 per calendar month, effective from 1st October 2024.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988, setting it at £670 per calendar month. The decision includes details on service charges and liability for repairs.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00BR/MNR/2024/0690 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 58 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME], Tribunal Judge [NAME], Valuer Member Landlord [RESPONDENT] ([RESPONDENT]) [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant Aaron and [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £670 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1st October 2024 *3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per *4. Service charges are variable and are not included 5. Date statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 1st January 2016 6. Rental period Calendar monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A 9. Description of premises 2-bedroom terrace property, 2 ground floor reception rooms, kitchen, bathroom, rear yard/garden, front garden. [NAME] of Decision 24th June 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the monthly rent for the property to be £670.
  • The new rent decision will become effective on October 1, 2024.
  • The property is a two-bedroom terrace with two reception rooms, a kitchen, a bathroom, and front and rear gardens.
  • The tenancy is an assured periodic tenancy that began on January 1, 2016.
  • The landlord is responsible for repairs as per Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £670 per calendar month, effective from 1st October 2024.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was about setting the rent for a 2-bedroom terrace property under an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £670 per calendar month, effective from 1st October 2024, following the Housing Act 1988 Section 14 determination.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the application of the Housing Act 1988 Section 14 to determine the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can expect their rent to be set according to the Housing Act 1988 Section 14.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.