VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Fair Rent of £1050 for Semi-Detached House

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant sought to have their rent reviewed by the First-tier Tribunal due to disputes with the landlord over the proposed increase from £995 to £1325 per month. After considering evidence and local rental values, the Tribunal set a new fair rent of £1050 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair determination of their rent based on the condition of the property and local rental values.

Topics

rental disputesproperty valuation

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the condition of the property and local rental values.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a property in Nantwich, considering both parties' submissions and its own knowledge of rental values.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the fair rent for a semi-detached house in Nantwich, considering local rental values and property condition. The new rent was set at £1050 per month.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00EQ/MNR/2025/0709 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 18 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME], Tribunal Judge [NAME], [APPELLANT] 32 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £1050 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 8th April 2025 *3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per *4. Service charges are variable and are not included 5. Date periodic assured tenancy commenced 3rd July 2022 6. Rental period Calendar monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A 9. Description of premises The property is 2-storey semi-detached house built in the 1930s occupying a corner plot. The front garden is covered with stone gravel. There is a garden the rear and side. The roof is double pitched with a hip and covered with clay tiles. The walls are of rendered cavity brickwork and the windows are uPVC framed with double glazing. Accommodation comprises: Ground Floor: hall, cupboard, living room, dining kitchen, side vestibule. The dining kitchen has patio doors leading to the rear garden. First Floor: 2 x double bedrooms, 1 x single bedroom, bathroom/w.c. with shower cubicle in addition to the bath. [NAME] of Decision 7th October 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : MAN/00EQ/MNR/2025/0709 Property : 18 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant: [redacted] Respondent : [redacted] : Section 14, Housing Act 1988 – Market Rent Determination Tribunal Members : [NAME], Tribunal Judge [NAME], FRICS, Valuer Member Date of Decision : 7th October 2025

DECISION 1. The rent is £1050.00 per calendar month. The new rent takes effect from 8th April 2025.

REASONS Preliminary Matters 1. In accordance with the ‘Practice Direction from the Senior President of Tribunals: Reasons for decisions’, this decision refers only to the main issues and evidence in dispute, and how those issues essential to the Tribunal’s conclusions have been resolved. Inspection and form of determination 2. The property was inspected on 7th October 2025.

3. The Applicant only was present at the inspection.

4. Neither party requested a hearing and the application was determined on the basis of the papers submitted by the parties in advance of the inspection, and the inspection. The Law 5. The Tribunal considered and applied section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 (HA 1988). Background to the application 6. The property (18 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]) is subject to an assured shorthold tenancy which commenced on 3rd January 2022. The original contractual tenancy was for a fixed term of 6 months. A statutory periodic tenancy arose on 3rd July 2022. It appears to be the case (confirmed by the tenant on the inspection) that the date on which rent is to be paid was varied by agreement of the parties to the 8th of each calendar month.

7. This application arises in consequence of service of a section 13 HA 1988 notice by the Respondent dated 19th February 2025. The notice proposed a new rent of £1325.00 per calendar month, to take effect from 8th April 2025, in place of the (then) current rent of £995.00 per calendar month. Issues 8. The following issues were identified for determination by the Tribunal: a. The market rent for the property which could be achieved if it were in good letting order; b. Whether there were any matters which made it appropriate to reduce the market rent, and, if so; c. The amount of any deductions from the market rent; d. The rent to be applied to the property in the light of any deductions; e. The commencement date for the rent, including potential undue hardship to the tenant. Relevant Evidence and the Tribunal’s Conclusions on the Issues Description 9. The property is 2-storey semi-detached house built in the 1930s occupying a corner plot. The front garden is covered with stone gravel and could accommodate 4 cars. There is a garden the rear and side.

10. The roof is double pitched with a hip and covered with clay tiles. The walls are of rendered cavity brickwork and the windows are uPVC framed with double glazing.

11. The accommodation comprises: a. Ground Floor: hall, cupboard, living room, dining kitchen, side vestibule. The dining kitchen has patio doors leading to the rear garden. b. First Floor: 2 x double bedrooms, 1 x single bedroom, bathroom/w.c. with shower cubicle in addition to the bath. c. The landlord provides carpets/floor coverings, curtains/blinds oven and hob. The tenant provides fridge freezer and washing machine d. There are several missing and dislodged roof tiles and the bath cannot be used due to water leakage. The internal doors need re-hanging, the upstairs carpets re-fitting and curtain rails provided to the ground and first floor bay windows. Market Rental Evidence 12. The Tribunal considered the evidence submitted by both parties (landlord representations by letter dated 22nd September 2025, tenant representations by letter date 15th September 2025) and relied on its own knowledge of rental values in Nantwich. Conclusion 13. The Tribunal concluded that the open market rent for the property in good condition would be £1150.00 per calendar month but, after making deductions in relation to the matters detailed above (tenant provided furnishing, landlord neglect, and necessary improvements), concluded the appropriate rent determined in accordance with section 14 Housing Act 1988 is £1050.00 per calendar month.

14. No evidence of “undue hardship to the tenant” within the meaning of section 14(7) Housing Act 1988 was submitted and the rent therefore applies with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the section 13 Notice, 8th April 2025. .

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 if they dispute it with their landlord.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a reasonable market rate under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • A landlord can reasonably expect a fair rent based on market conditions and statutory caps, adjusted for tenant contributions and improvements.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent set by a First-tier Tribunal under the Housing Act 1988 when there is a dispute over the amount.
  • A tenant is entitled to have their rent and service charges determined by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal determined that the fair market rent for the property is £1050 per calendar month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rental rates.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal inspected the property and considered evidence from both parties before determining the fair rent based on local market values and the condition of the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was applied to determine the fair rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property and local rental values played a significant role in determining the fair rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can seek a fair determination based on local rental values and property condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence of local rental values, property inspection reports, and submissions from both parties were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions by the First-tier Tribunal can generally be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.