VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 PCM for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £800 per month for a three-bedroom terraced house in an assured periodic tenancy based on market rates, considering comparable rents in Stoke-on-Trent and surrounding areas.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a reasonable market rate under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a reasonable market rent for the property, considering comparable rental situations in the area.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market rates.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market rates, considering comparable rents in Stoke-on-Trent and surrounding areas. The decision took effect from March 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – [NAME] No. BIR/00GL/MNR/2025/0623

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS]., Stoke-on-Trent, [POSTCODE]

I D Humphries B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS Judge D R Salter

Landlord Lu & [RESPONDENT] 31 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT] & [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 800.00 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 8 March 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable N/A Per N/A

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 8 December 2022 5. Length of the term or rental period Calendar monthly 6. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Unfurnished. 8. Description of premises Three bedroom terraced house.

Chairman

I D Humphries B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS Date of Decision 14 January 2026

1

Case Reference : BIR/00GL/MNR/2025/0623

Property

: 216 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Respondent: [redacted] : Appeal against a Notice proposing a new rent under an

Assured Periodic Tenancy under section 13(4) of the Housing

Act 1988

Tribunal Members : I.D. Humphries B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS

Judge David R. Salter

Date and Venue of : None. Decided on papers Hearing

Date of Decision : 14 January 2026

Date of Issue

: 11 June 2026

____________________________________________________________

REASONS FOR DECISION

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL [NAME] (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

1 The rent is determined at £800.00 (Eight Hundred Pounds) per calendar month from 8 March 2025.

REASONS

Introduction

2 The tenants, [APPELLANT] and [NAME], hold a monthly assured tenancy of [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] which is a three bedroom terraced house. The tenancy commenced on 8 December 2022 at an initial rent of £675 pcm for the first six months. By January 2025 the rent had increased to £710 pcm.

3 On 31 January 2025 the landlord served notice of increase under section 13(2) of The Housing Act 1988 proposing an increase to £850.00 pcm to take effect on 8 March 2025. The rent did not include any Council Tax, water rates or service charges.

4 On 7 March 2025, Mr [APPELLANT] on behalf of the tenants, applied for the rent to be determined by the First-tier Tribunal ([NAME]).

5 The Tribunal has considered the case based on the evidence submitted by the parties together with its own knowledge, experience and online research. Neither party requested a hearing.

The Law

6 Section 14 of The Housing Act 1988 provides:

'(1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy -

(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to

which the notice relates;

(b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice;

(c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as

those of the tenancy to which the notice relates;...'

'(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded -

(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant;

(b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant

improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the

tenant, if the improvement-

(i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to the

immediate landlord ...'

Facts Found

7 The Tribunal has not inspected the property and relies on the evidence submitted by the parties and online research.

3

8 The property comprises a terraced house with living room, three bedrooms, kitchen and bathroom. It has a private garden accessed via a shared alley.

9 The house has central heating, double glazing, carpets, curtains and white goods provided by the landlord, but is otherwise let unfurnished.

Evidence

10 The Tenants' Submission

The Tenants did not provide any submissions.

11 The Landlord's Submission

The Landlord made various points:

a) the Tenant had never requested any repairs or improvements.

b) the property had a Gas Safe Certificate.

c) in February 2024 the former Managing Agents reported mould in the property

which was said to be due to the Tenants' inadequate use of heating and ventilation.

The Landlord had arranged for it to be professionally cleaned at the time.

d) the Landlord considered the requested rent of £850 pcm to be fair and helpfully

provided a detailed schedule of 22 comparable rents of terraced houses in Stoke-

on-Trent and the surrounding area, ranging from £700-£950 pcm.

Decision

12 The Tribunal noted the variety of rents offered in evidence but having paid particular attention to the rents of three bedroom terraced houses in the schedule, together with its own knowledge and experience, found the Market Rent to be £800 pcm at the effective date of 8 March 2025.

13 Accordingly, the Tribunal determines the rent under section 14 of The Housing Act 1988

at £800.00 (Eight Hundred pounds) pcm with effect from 8 March 2025.

I.D. Humphries B.Sc.(Est.Man.) FRICS

Chairman

Appeal

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision an application may be made to the Upper Tribunal, [NAME] (Residential Property) on a point of law arising from this Decision only. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to the Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be received within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52(2) of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) ([NAME]) Rules 2013) stating the grounds on which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £800 per calendar month.
  • The tribunal considered the landlord's detailed schedule of comparable rents for similar properties.
  • The tribunal relied on its own knowledge, experience, and online research to determine the rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the rent at £800 per month for a three-bedroom terraced house.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in setting the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal decided based on comparable rents in Stoke-on-Trent and surrounding areas.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The landlord provided a detailed schedule of comparable rents in Stoke-on-Trent and surrounding areas.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially for the tenant, setting a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can appeal to set their rent based on market rates.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The comparable rents schedule provided by the landlord was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, an application may be made to the Upper Tribunal for permission to appeal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.