Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
A tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal to challenge a proposed increase in their rent. The tribunal reviewed evidence of local rental prices and determined that the fair market rent for the property was £1500 pcm, effective from March 29th, 2026.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market rate under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
This section allows landlords to propose increases in rent for assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies, through a notice in a prescribed form. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy, which begins at least two months after the notice is served.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Croydon.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Croydon, setting it at £1500 per calendar month based on comparable properties and local rental values.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Other
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
LON/00AH/MNR/2026/0232
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
[NAME]
Tenant’s Representative
In person
Landlord
[NAME] (Croydon) [RESPONDENT]
3rd Floor Sutherland House, 70–78 West Hendon Broadway, London, [POSTCODE],
Landlord’s [COUNSEL] of Streets Ahead
Date of Application
26 March 2026
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision
15 June 2026
Rent Determined
£1500.00 per calendar month
Date the new rent takes effect
15 June 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 13 February 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1575 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1500 pcm to take effect from 29 March 2026.
2. On 26 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent received on 27 March 2026.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 29 June 2023. The rental period is monthly on the 29th of the month.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Liability for Council Tax
5. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Inspection/Hearing
6. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
The Property
7. The Tribunal did not inspect.
8. The Property is a third floor flat, offering the following accommodation:
1 bedroom, small internal store room open plan living room/kitchen Bathroom.
The Property is situated in central Croydon close to shopping and public transport.
3
Evidence
9. Only the Tenant returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.
The Tenant.
10. The Tenant made the following comments:
a) The rent is already full. b) One of the comparable blocks has a gym and concierge.
11. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant had provided
The Landlord
a) No evidence was received from the Landlord
Determination and Valuation
12. The tribunal considers the comparables provided give a good guide to the level of rents.
13. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables provided, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1500 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market.
14. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made no adjustments The full valuation is shown below:
Undue hardship
T says 1 bed flat in same bldg advertised at £1450 pm [ADDRESS] 1450 pm I bed flat George st 1557 pm I bed flat with amenities gym concierge PCM AST Market rent 1,500.00 £ less condition/terms 0.0% - £ 1,500.00 £
4
15. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
16. No claim of undue hardship has been made.
Decision
17. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1500 per calendar month with effect from 29 March 2026.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent Amid Financial Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent of £618.75 pcm for Ipswich flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Portsmouth Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent adjustment must be supported by reliable comparables and evidence of property condition.
- Undue hardship caused by the proposed rent increase can lead to the case being allowed in part.
- The rent should be determined by a tribunal if the landlord serves a notice proposing a new rent under Section 13(4)(a).
❌ Tends to be rejected
- If the rent is set without considering relevant comparables and expert valuation, the case may be dismissed.
- If the rent determination does not take place through the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber), it might result in dismissal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent at £1500 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in setting the rental price for an assured tenancy.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal reviewed comparable properties and local rental values to determine the fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were used to set the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The tribunal considered comparable rental prices in determining the fair market value for the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was neutral, setting a fair market rate based on evidence provided.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can apply to the tribunal for a determination of a fair market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of comparable rental prices and local rental values was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Either party may appeal on points of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for specific guidance.
