VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal set a new rental rate for an assured tenancy at £1050 per month after considering a landlord's notice proposing an increase under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988. The tenant referred the matter to the tribunal, and no oral hearing was requested.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have a new rent determined by the First-tier Tribunal if the landlord serves a notice proposing an increase under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must be in a prescribed form and specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy. The new period must begin at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased, the next increase can only occur after a specified period, which varies depending on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. If a landlord serves a notice proposing an increase in rent, the tenant can refer the notice to the tribunal. The tribunal then determines the open-market rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let by a willing landlord under similar terms.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent at £1050 per calendar month based on a landlord's notice under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988. The tenant referred the proposed increase to the tribunal, and no oral hearing was requested.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

MAN/OOCB/MNR/2025/1065 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

[NAME]

Tenant’s Representative

N/A

Landlord

[COUNSEL] Landlord’s Address

c/o [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE].

Landlord’s Representative

N/A

Date of Application

10 December 2025

Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members Judge Watkin Valuer Member – [NAME] of Decision

17 Apri 2026

Rent Determined

£1050 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

25 February 2026

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 20 October 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1200 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £810 pcm to take effect from 14 December 2025.

2. On 10 December 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 14 May 2023. The rental period is monthly, commencing on the 14th of each month.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. No service charges were identified as part of or separately from the rent. The Tenant stated in his application form that no furniture was provided by the Landlord.

Liability for Council Tax

6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

7. No other particular tenancy terms were taken into consideration.

Inspection/Hearing

8. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

3

The Property

9. The Applicant declined an inspection, although he has provided photographs of the interior.

10. The Property is a semi-detached house with a kitchen, a living room, a bathroom and three bedrooms. Externally, there is a front and rear garden, a garage and a driveway(from Application).

11. The Property is situated in Spital which is a pleasant residential area within easy commuting distance to Liverpool. The surrounding area is predominantly residential with all amenities close by.

Determination and Valuation

12. The Tribunal used its general knowledge of Market Rents in the vicinity to decide that the Market Rent of the subject property is £1050.00 per calendar month.

13. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made not made any adjustments.

Undue hardship

14. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

15. The Tenant has asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case as he receives Universal Credit and carers allowance. This has not been challenged by the Respondent. However, the Tribunal does not consider that the Applicant should benefit from any delay in applying to the Tribunal.

Decision

16. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1050 per calendar month with effect from 25 February 2026.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this

4

Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent is set at a fair market value based on comparables and expert assessment.
  • The rent takes into account the condition of the property and any ongoing issues affecting its use.
  • The rent is adjusted based on the condition of shared facilities and utilities provided by the landlord.
  • The rent is determined by the First-tier Tribunal if it causes undue hardship.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The rent is set at the market rate based on comparable properties without considering the condition of the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set a new rental rate for an assured tenancy at £1050 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the case, with no representatives present.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal used its knowledge of market rents in the area to determine the new rent without making any adjustments.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 13 and Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tribunal's knowledge of market rents in the area was crucial to determining the new rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was neither fully for nor against the tenant, as it set a middle ground between the proposed and existing rents.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase notice can refer the matter to the tribunal for determination of market rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographs of the property provided by the tenant were considered, but no oral hearing was requested.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Either party may appeal on a point of law to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for specific guidance and representation.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.