VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Due to Property Issues

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the proposed market rent of £1200 per month for a semi-detached house in Lancaster to £1150 per month, taking into account persistent water leaks and other property issues that affected its usability.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have the market rent adjusted based on the condition of the property and any ongoing issues affecting its use.

Topics

tenancyrent adjustment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 allows landlords to propose increases in rent for assured periodic tenancies, provided they follow a prescribed procedure and timing requirements.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

This section implies certain repairing obligations for landlords in short leases, including the maintenance of the structure, exterior, and essential installations of the dwelling-house.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a semi-detached house in Lancaster, adjusting the proposed rent due to ongoing issues.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a semi-detached house in Lancaster, adjusting it from £1200 pcm to £1150 pcm due to ongoing issues affecting its condition and use.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

MAN/30UH/MNR/2026/0078

[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

[NAME] [COUNSEL]

Tenant’s Representative

Landlord

[COUNSEL]

Landlord’s Address

20 Edmunds Vale, Durham, [POSTCODE]

Landlord’s [COUNSEL] [RESPONDENT] of Application 23 February 2026

Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members Tribunal Judge Steer & Mr J Faulkner FRICS

Date of Decision

19 May 2026

Rent Determined

£1,150.00 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

28 February 2026

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 22 January 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1200.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1094.50 pcm to take effect from 28 February 2026.

2. On 23 February 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 31 August 2021 for a term of 6 months. The rental period is monthly.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. There are no service charges payable in respect of the Property. The Property was rented on a ‘fully furnished’ basis.

Liability for Council Tax

6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

7. None

Inspection/Hearing

8. The Tenant requested an inspection of the Property which was refused by the Tribunal for the reasons detailed in their letter of 27 March 2026. It follows that there was not an inspection of the Property or an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

The Property

9. The Property is a 2-storey modern semi-detached house with a yard which is let on ‘fully furnished’ terms. The accommodation compromises a living room, kitchen and w/c on the ground floor and 3 bedrooms and a bathroom with w/c on the first floor.

3

Evidence

10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.

The Tenant.

11. The Tenant made the following comments:

a) There has been a long-standing water leak over several years affecting the bathroom area. Although temporary repairs have been undertaken, the issue is not resolved. Despite the bathroom remaining usable, the leak has caused a deterioration to the internal surfaces of the bathroom and affects the normal use of the bathroom. Further, the persistent leak has caused damage t the ground floor ceiling and the internal walls; and

b) There are issues with the functioning of the hob and the washing machine.

12. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant has provided a number of comparable properties in the locality to the subject property each advertised to let on Right Move which range from £825pcm to £1200pcm.

The Landlord

13. The Landlord confirmed that the proposed rent of £1200pcm was the rental valuation provided by her estate agents and was based upon comparable properties in the local area. The Landlord offered three comparable properties ranging from £1400pcm to £950pcm. The Landlord accepted that she was aware of ongoing issues at the Property and was attempting to resolve them ‘at the root’.

Determination and Valuation

14. The Tribunal considers that the comparables provided by the Landlord and the Tenant are relevant to this matter. However, it is noted that only a small number of the comparables offered by both the Landlord and the Tenant relate to semi-detached houses.

15. Relying on its own expertise and general knowledge of rental values in the area, the current rent and the comparables provided by the Landlord and the Tenant, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property in good order would be £1,200.00 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the Property to let for in the open market if it was in the same condition as the comparable properties.

16. From this level of rent, having viewed photographs of the Property, considered the supporting documentation by the parties and the admission made by the Landlord, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) The longstanding water leak in the bathroom.

4

The full valuation is shown below:

Starting rent

£1,200.00 pcm

Less

a) Items given under a) above

£50.00

Market Rent

£1,150.00 pcm

Decision

17. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1,150.00 per calendar month with effect from 28 February 2026.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

5

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Rent adjustments are considered fair when based on the condition of the property.
  • Rent determinations are deemed fair when they consider the condition of shared facilities and utilities.
  • Rent determinations are allowed when they are made by the First-tier Tribunal following a landlord's notice under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • Rent adjustments are not allowed if they are solely based on current market conditions without considering property conditions.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal adjusted the proposed market rent from £1200 pcm to £1150 pcm.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in a dispute over the market rent of a semi-detached house.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal considered evidence about property issues and comparable rental prices to adjust the proposed rent.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 and Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The persistent water leak affecting the bathroom and ground floor ceiling was a key issue in adjusting the rent.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, as the proposed rent was reduced.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a similar issue can argue that ongoing property issues should be considered when determining market rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence about comparable rental prices and documentation of property issues were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party may apply for permission to appeal the decision on any point of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.