VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Tenant Dispute

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair market rent for an assured tenancy after a landlord proposed a significant increase in rent. The tenant objected to the proposed rent of £2,000 pcm and the tribunal set the new rent at £430 pcm.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market rate by the First-tier Tribunal when faced with an unreasonable rent increase notice from the landlord under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section allows landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent for an assured periodic tenancy, provided the notice is in the prescribed form and specifies a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy. The new period must begin at least two months after the notice is served. Additionally, if the rent has been previously increased under this section, the next increase can only occur after a certain period, which varies based on the type of tenancy.

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under this section, a tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under similar conditions to the existing tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy after considering the Landlord's proposed increase and the Tenant's objections.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy after considering a landlord's proposed increase of £2,000 pcm and the tenant's objections. The tribunal set the new rent at £430 pcm with effect from May 24, 2026.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference MAN/00BN/MNR/2026/0220 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE], United Kingdom Tenant [COUNSEL] Tenant’s Representative Landlord [APPELLANT] Landlord’s Address 252 upper Chorlton rd, Old Trafford, Manchester, [POSTCODE], United Kingdom Landlord’s Representative Versus law solicitors Date of Application 20 April 2026 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members [NAME] – [NAME] of Decision 6 June 2026 Rent Determined £430.00 per calendar month Date the new rent takes effect 24 May 2026

2

REASONS FOR THE

DECISION Background 1. On 02 April 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £2,000.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £410.00 pcm to take effect from 24 May 2026.

2. On 20 April 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 24 May 2029 for an initial term of two years. The rental period is monthly. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. Are set out in part D of the Assured Shorthold Tenancy agreement dated 20 May 2019 and are essentially as per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. Property is a fully furnished room and the utilities are included within the rental amount. Liability for Council Tax 6. The Landlord is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is inclusive of Council Tax. Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

7. All of them generally.

3 Inspection/Hearing 8. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. The Property 9. The Property is a fully furnished room within a HMO situated on the first floor of a converted terrace house; the Tenant states that the property offers the following accommodation: “5 bedrooms in total: - My bedroom – large (approximately 18 m²) 2 other large bedrooms – approximately 16 m² - 2 smaller bedrooms – approximately 14 m² Shared kitchen – approximately 17 m² Shared bathroom – approximately 13 m² Separate WC – approximately 2 m² No proper shared living room – the space used as a living room is mainly used for drying clothes and limited use.” The Property benefits from gas central heating and double glazing. The Property is situated on the western fringe of Whalley Range area of Manchester within close proximity of amenities. Manchester City Centre is approximately 2 miles to the north east. Evidence 10. Both the Landlord and the Tenant returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms. The Landlord 11. The landlord at 2.4 of the form agreed with the Tenant’s proposal.

12. The Landlord did not complete 2.5, nor supplied any evidence to support the rent proposed in the s.13 notice.

4 The Tenant.

13. The Tenant noted, at 2.1, the Landlord’s agreement. Determination and Valuation 14. In light of the parties agreeing, the Tribunal sets the Market rent as follows: Market rent £430.00 pcm Undue hardship 12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

13. The Tenant has not asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case.

14. Therefore , the new rent will start from the date of the Landlord’s notice being 24 May 2026. Decision 15. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £430.00 per calendar month with effect from 24 May 2026. APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The landlord agreed with the tenant's proposed rent, which the Tribunal then set as the market rent.
  • The Tribunal determined the market rent based on the agreement between both parties.
  • The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice because the tenant did not request a later start date due to hardship.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The landlord failed to provide any evidence to support the significantly higher rent proposed in their Section 13 notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal determined that the fair market rent for the property is £430 per month.

Who was involved?

A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over the rental amount.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal reviewed the evidence provided by both parties and set the rent based on market conditions and fair value.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were used to determine the new rental amount.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant's objection to an unreasonable rent increase notice from the landlord was crucial in setting a fair market rate.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision favoured the tenant, as it set a significantly lower rental amount than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing an unreasonable rent increase can seek determination of fair market rent through the First-tier Tribunal.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The tribunal considered the tenant's objections and the lack of supporting evidence from the landlord.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Either party may appeal on a point of law to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.