First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £900 pcm
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent for a property in Liverpool at £900 per month. The decision was based on comparable properties and the current state of the rented house.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market value based on comparable properties in good order.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering various factors including the terms of the existing tenancy and any improvements made by the tenant.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured shorthold tenancy, considering comparables and property condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured shorthold tenancy in Liverpool, setting it at £900 pcm after considering comparables and property condition.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference MAN/00BY/MNR/2026/0134 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant [NAME] Tenant’s Representative Landlord [COUNSEL] Landlord’s [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Landlord’s [NAME] of Application 26 March 2026 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members [NAME] – [NAME] of Decision 18 June 2026 Rent Determined £900.00 per calendar month Date the new rent takes effect 14 April 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE
DECISION Background 1. On 12 March 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,100.00 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £850.00 pcm to take effect from 14 April 2026.
2. On 26 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured shorthold tenancy commenced on 14 January 2023 for a term of 6 months. The rental period is monthly. Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per tenancy agreement and section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
5. The Tenant does not pay any service charges, The Property is let unfurnished. Liability for Council Tax 6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax. Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
7. N/A. Inspection/Hearing 8. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise. The Property 9. The Property is described in the submissions as a semi-detached house providing the following accommodation: Ground Floor: kitchen, living room First Floor: 2 bedrooms, bathroom Outside: front and rear gardens
3 The Property is situated in central Liverpool, close to [ADDRESS]. Evidence 10. Both parties were provided with the option to make written submissions. Representations were received only from the Tenant. The Tenant 11. The Tenant provided internal photographs showing, amongst other things, disrepair to the kitchen and areas with a clear appearance of damp.
12. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant provided screenshots of the following comparables: a. [ADDRESS] - £900 pcm b. [ADDRESS] - £875 pcm c. [ADDRESS] - £895 pcm Determination and Valuation 13. The Tribunal attached limited weight to the comparables provided by the Tenant as no meaningful details were provided for any of them other than the street name and asking rent (and an external photograph for [ADDRESS]). The Tribunal also noted that the addresses of the comparables were some distance from the Property.
14. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1,000.00 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as comparable properties.
15. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following: a) The condition of the Property relative to the comparable properties, which are generally maintained to a higher standard and in particular noting the condition of the kitchen and evidence of damp. The full valuation is shown below: Starting Rent £1,000.00 pcm Less a) Items given under a) above £100.00 Market rent £900.00 pcm
4 Undue hardship 16. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
17. The Tenant has stated that a rent increase will cause financial hardship. Only very limited information and supporting evidence was provided as to the Tenant’s financial position.
18. Whilst any significant increase in rent will inevitably cause some measure of hardship, in considering whether to exercise its discretion to postpone the rent increase, the question for the Tribunal is whether undue hardship will be caused. In this case, the Tribunal does not consider that a case for undue hardship is established.
Accordingly, the new rent will take effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Decision 19. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £900.00 per calendar month with effect from 14 April 2026. APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £1,250 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Shorthold Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Manchester Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rental Rate for Manchester Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 PCM for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal reduced the market rent due to the property's condition, specifically noting issues with the kitchen and damp.
- The Tribunal determined the market rent based on its own expert knowledge of rental values in the area.
- The Tribunal considered the market rental of the property if it were modernised and in good order.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's claim of undue financial hardship was not established due to limited supporting evidence.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It decided that the market rent for an assured shorthold tenancy should be set at £900 pcm.
Who was involved?
The tenant and landlord were involved in a dispute over rental prices.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal considered comparable properties and the condition of the property to determine the fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were used in this decision.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property relative to comparable properties was a key factor in setting the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partly in favour of the tenant, as it set a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can seek a fair market valuation based on comparable properties and property condition.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property's condition and rental comparables were important pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal on points of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
