First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for an assured tenancy at £1800 per month after considering comparable properties and local rental trends. The decision was based on evidence provided by both parties and expert knowledge of the area's housing market.
⚖️ Legal holding
A landlord's proposed increase in rent must be supported by reliable comparables and evidence of property condition to justify a new market rent under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
📖 What the law says
This section of the Housing Act 1988 allows landlords to propose an increase in rent for assured periodic tenancies, provided they follow a prescribed procedure and specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period. The new rent can only be implemented if the landlord serves a notice in the prescribed form and the period starts at least two months after the notice is served.
This section implies a repairing obligation for landlords in short leases, meaning the landlord must keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, installations for utilities like water, gas, and electricity, and installations for space heating and hot water in good repair and working order.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy based on comparable properties and expert knowledge of rental values in Southall.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the market rent of a ground floor flat in Southall based on comparables and rental values, setting the new rent at £1800 pcm from April 2026.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
LON/00AJ/MNR/2026/0235
[ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant
[NAME] & [NAME]
Tenant’s Representative
In Person
Landlord
[COUNSEL]
Landlord’s [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE],
Landlord’s [COUNSEL] of [RESPONDENT] of Application
28 March 2026
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Decision
15 June 2026
Rent Determined
£1800 per calendar month
Date the new rent takes effect
1 April 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 5 February 2026, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1950 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1800 pcm to take effect from 1 April 2026.
2. On 28 March 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 1 April 2025 for a term of 6 months. The rental period is monthly on the first of the month.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Liability for Council Tax
5. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Inspection/Hearing
6. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
The Property
7. The tribunal did not inspect. The tenant applied for an inspection but in a decision dated 15 May 2026 the tribunal refused the request as the photographs and supporting evidence were of good quality and inspecting would not be proportionate to the tenant’s concerns.
8. The Property is a ground floor flat, offering the following accommodation:
3
Open plan reception room and kitchen, 2 bedrooms (1 ensuite) and bathroom/WC.
Outside: access to a communal garden
The Property benefits from central heating and double glazing.
The Property is situated in Southall, close to public transport and shopping.
Evidence
9. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.
The Tenant.
10. The Tenant made the following comments:
a) The flat suffers from mould and dampness due to inadequate ventilation b) A broken shower tray
11. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant had provided:
The Landlord
12. The Landlord provided evidence the shower had been repaired. A damp report suggested the mould was caused by restricted ventilation rather than a structural issue with furniture against colder external wall surfaces. Other tenants in the block had accepted rent increases but no details were given.
Determination and Valuation
13. The Tribunal considers the comparables provided by the Tenant are reliable and at a consistent level
14. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1800 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties. [NAME] 1,800.00 £ pcm quoting unfurnished 27/1/26 high spec modern flat [ADDRESS] 1,800.00 £ pcm quoting 13/2/26 older flat good rep [ADDRESS] 1,875.00 £ pcm quoting 24/3/26 new build in gated scheme
4
15. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made no adjustments
Undue hardship
16. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. No hardship has been claimed.
Decision
17. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1800 per calendar month with effect from 1 April 2026.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
PCM AST Market rent 1,800.00 £ less condition/terms 0.0% - £ 1,800.00 £
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Portsmouth Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent Amid Financial Hardship
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent of £618.75 pcm for Ipswich flat
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Rent increases must be justified by reliable comparables and evidence of property condition.
- The tribunal considers undue hardship when setting a new market rent.
- Rent should be set at a fair market rate based on comparable properties and the condition of the rented property.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- Rent adjustments based solely on comparable properties without considering the property's condition were not sufficient.
- Rent determinations based on local conditions without reliable comparables were dismissed.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the new rent for an assured tenancy at £1800 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in the dispute over rental increase.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal decided based on comparables provided by both parties and its own knowledge of local rental values.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 s.13 and Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The comparables provided by both parties and the Tribunal's expert knowledge of rental values in Southall were crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
It was a mixed outcome, with the rent remaining at £1800 pcm as proposed by the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rental increase should gather reliable comparables and evidence of property condition to support their case.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparables, repair reports, and local rental trends were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, an appeal can be made on points of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is highly recommended to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor.
