VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, setting it at £850 per month excluding certain charges. The decision is based on Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent set according to the Housing Act 1988, section 14, which was applied in this case to determine the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.

Topics

tenancy agreementrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. The application can't be made if the rent is already set by a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The rent for an assured periodic tenancy was set at £850 per month, effective from December 3rd, 2024.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the rent and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988. The decision sets a monthly rent excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts specified in paras 3 & 4.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/30UM/MNR/2024/0722

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises

The Tribunal members were 6 Belvedere Fold, Waterfoot, Rossendale, [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mrs [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], Bury, Lancashire, [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £850 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 3-Dec-24

*3. The amount included for services is/is negligible/not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date periodic/statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 3-Feb-18

6. Rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per tenancy agreement

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A

9. Description of premises Detached house: G/F: Hall, Living Room, Kitchen 1/F: 2 x Double Bedroom, Box Room, Bathroom External: [ADDRESS], [NAME] of Decision 11 June 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tribunal set the rent for the property at £850 per month.
  • The decision on the rent will become effective on 3 December 2024.
  • The tenancy agreement specifies the allocation of liability for repairs.
  • The property is a detached house with a hall, living room, and kitchen on the ground floor.
  • The first floor of the property includes two double bedrooms, a box room, and a bathroom.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the monthly rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £850, effective from December 3rd, 2024.

What was the dispute about?

The dispute was over the amount of rent for an assured periodic tenancy in a detached house in Bury, Lancashire.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided to set the rent at £850 per month based on the Housing Act 1, which governs such determinations.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied to determine the rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument centered on the application of the Housing Act 1988 to set the rent for the assured periodic tenancy.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the person who brought the case, likely the tenant seeking to have the rent set.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can seek a determination under the Housing Act 1988 to set the rent for their assured periodic tenancy.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The judgment does not specify the evidence or documents that mattered.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.