VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent and service charges for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy. The decision clarifies the terms of the rental agreement as required by law.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent and service charges clearly defined under an assured periodic tenancy agreement as per Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancy agreementsrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, the application cannot be made if the rent is based on a previous determination under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, tenants can also challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). When determining the rent, the tribunal considers what a willing landlord would charge for a similar tenancy in the open market.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy and set out the terms of the tenancy agreement.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent and service charges for an assured periodic tenancy agreement, setting out clear terms under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First Tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. MAN/00EU/MNR/2025/0794 Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination) Housing Act 1988 Section 14 Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 20 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] [NAME], Tribunal Judge [NAME], MRICS, Valuer Member Landlord [NAME] c/ 222 Estates, [ADDRESS],Orford Warrington Cheshire Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £650 Per Calendar month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3 & 4)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 28th June 2025 *3. The amount included for services is not applicable Per *4. Service charges are variable and are not included 5. Date statutory periodic assured tenancy commenced 28th September 2024 6. Rental period Calendar monthly 7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord N/A 9. Description of premises The property is a ground floor flat in a purpose-built 2-storey building forming part of terrace some 40 years old. Garden to rear. The roof is double pitched and tile covered. The external walls are of cavity brickwork. Windows are uPVC double glazed. Accommodation Comprises: Hallway, shower-room / w.c. 2 x stores, double bedroom, living room with patio doors to rear garden, kitchen. [NAME] of Decision 4th September 2025

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

Allowed11 cases
Allowed in Part1 case

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The tenant disputes the rent with the landlord.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent set by a tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent and service charges clearly defined.
  • The tenant is entitled to a fair determination of their rent based on comparable properties and local rental values.
  • The tenant is entitled to have their rent and terms of a tenancy agreement assessed by the First-tier Tribunal.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

It set the rent at £650 per calendar month, excluding water rates and council tax.

Who was involved?

The tenant and landlord were involved in a dispute over rent terms.

How did the court decide, and why?

The Tribunal applied Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 to determine the rent based on the property's value and market conditions.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988 was used to set the terms of the assured periodic tenancy agreement.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tenant argued for a fair rent based on market conditions and property value, which the Tribunal agreed with.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It was in favour of the tenant as it set out clear terms for the tenancy agreement.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent dispute can seek clarity on their rental terms through the First-tier Tribunal under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Property details, market data, and tenancy agreement were key in determining the rent.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) — headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.