AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·29 Nov 2023
Tribunal rules tenant breached lease covenants over upper maisonette maintenance
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·02 Jul 2024
Tribunal Upholds £5,529.56 in Service Charges for Residential Tenancy in London
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·20 Jun 2024
Tribunal Grants Urgent Works Dispensation Without Conditions
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to bypass consultation requirements for urgent roof repairs, ensuring safety without delay.
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·20 Mar 2024
First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Purchase Price at £32,474
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·27 Feb 2024
Tribunal Upholds Fair Rent Determination for Disabled Tenant
The Tribunal confirmed the fair rent set by the Rent Officer for a disabled tenant's property, ruling that the rent should remain at £92.00 per week excluding certain charges, as determined by the Rent Officer.
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·09 Feb 2024
Tenant's Service Charges Disallowed Due to Improper Demand
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·12 Jan 2024
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4163143
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·12 Jan 2024
Tribunal Rejects Tenant's Challenges to Service Charges
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant must pay service charges if the landlord has followed the correct procedures under the law. The tenant's challenges were dismissed.
Struck OutFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·09 Jan 2024
Claimant's Application for Manager Struck Out Due to Insufficient Cooperation
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·21 Dec 2023
Freeholder Granted Dispensation for Fire Safety Work Without Leaseholder Consultation
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a freeholder to bypass leaseholder consultation for replacing a fire safety vent because the leaseholders were unlikely to face any harm or disadvantage.
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·21 Dec 2023
Tribunal Upholds Pitch Fee Increases Based on RPI
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·21 Dec 2023
Tenant Secures Right to Manage Property in First-tier Tribunal Decision
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·03 Dec 2023
First-tier Tribunal Sets Premium for Property Enfranchisement
The First-tier Tribunal determined the appropriate amount to be paid for the collective enfranchisement of a property where the landlord could not be found. The tribunal set the premium at £85,826 based on a valuation report.
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·02 Dec 2023
First-tier Tribunal Dismisses Appeal Against Emergency Prohibition Order
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·08 Jan 2026
First-tier Tribunal Approves Pitch Fee Increase for Mobile Home Site
The First-tier Tribunal decided to allow an increase in the pitch fee for a mobile home site. The increase was calculated using a method based on price indices, and the Tribunal found it reasonable.
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·20 Jun 2024
Tribunal rules service charges payable for assured tenancy in London
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·01 May 2024
Landlord Granted Dispensation for Additional Costs in Tenancy Dispute
In this case, the landlord was allowed to bypass the usual consultation process for an extra cost incurred while replacing the Automatic Opening Ventilation System. The tribunal ruled that there was no significant harm to the tenants because they were already consulted on the initial cost estimate.
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·24 Apr 2024
Landlord Granted Urgent Repairs Dispensation to Prevent Flooding
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·01 Feb 2024
Tenant Granted Extended Lease for £78,950 - First-tier Tribunal
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·16 Jan 2024
First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Decision — Case 4163125
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to skip the usual consultation process for urgent repairs to a retaining wall, as there was no evidence that the leaseholders would be harmed by the decision.