
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the purchase price for the freehold interest of a property should be nil pounds after considering a valuation report. This means the applicant will not have to pay any money to acquire the freehold interest.
The First-tier Tribunal reviewed service charges for a tenant, reducing management charges and allowing a person premiums while disallowing maintenance charges. The decision was based on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The First-tier Tribunal upheld a financial penalty imposed on a tenant for failing to comply with an Improvement Notice within the specified timeframe. The tenant argued that they had difficulties contacting their tenant and that the local housing authority did not consider their representations. However, the Tribunal found that the tenant had no reasonable excuse for the delay and that the procedural requirements were met.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £136.50 per week for a property, using a specific formula from the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the maximum fair rent for a property, setting it at £181.50 per week. This decision ensures that the rent charged is fair and follows the guidelines set by the Rent Act 1977 and the Rent Acts (Maximum Fair Rent) Order 1999.
The Tribunal decided on a fair rent of £485.00 per month for a property, excluding certain costs like water rates and council tax but including fuel charges. This decision was made according to the Rent Act 1977.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled that a weekly service charge of £2 is reasonable and payable. The tribunal also made a s.20C order limiting the landlord's costs in the proceedings.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £160 per week from June 3rd, 2022, based on what similar properties in Peterborough are renting for.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a landlord to proceed with major works without consulting the leaseholders, determining it was reasonable to do so under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the amount of accrued and uncommitted service charges under the a person. The tribunal determined the amount to be £388,821.94, rejecting the respondent's request to postpone the proceedings due to ongoing criminal investigations.
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to a landlord to bypass certain consultation requirements for works on a property. The works were deemed necessary due to health and safety concerns and to minimise costs. The decision was made without objections from the tenants.
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission to skip certain consultation procedures for urgent fire safety works at a property. The works included installing a new fire alarm system and improving an existing mist suppression system. The decision was made due to the emergency nature of the works and the absence of objections from a person.
The Tribunal decided on the reasonableness of a service charge for future works in a residential property. The works were necessary to address unusual noises in the building, and the cost was found to fall under the landlord's repairing covenant.