VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Value at Nil Pounds

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that the purchase price for the freehold interest of a property should be nil pounds after considering a valuation report. This means the applicant will not have to pay any money to acquire the freehold interest.

⚖️ Legal holding

Under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967, the appropriate sum to be paid into Court for the freehold interest of a property can be determined to be nil pounds based on a valuation.

Topics

valuationfreehold interestLeasehold Reform Act 1967

Provisions

Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.27(5)Leasehold Reform Act 1967 s.9

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the purchase price for the freehold interest of a property to be nil pounds based on a valuation.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the purchase price for the freehold interest of a property to be nil pounds based on a valuation under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The valuation considered the capitalised value of the existing lease ground rent, the modern ground rent, and the value of the freehold as reversion at the expiry of the new extended lease.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

Case Reference : MAN/00EQ/OAF/2022/0032

Property : [NAME] (Edgebank House), [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Applicant : [redacted] : [APPELLANT]

Respondents : [redacted]

Type of Application : A determination of amount of the appropriate sum to be paid into Court under the section 27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967

Tribunal Members : Tribunal Judge Professor C Hunter

Tribunal Member [NAME] and venue of : Determined without a hearing on 25 Hearing

October, 2022

Date of Decision : 25 October 2022

_______________________________________________

DECISION _______________________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2022 FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Order

That the purchase price for the freehold interest of [NAME] (Edgebank House), [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] be determined at £0 (nil pounds).

The provisions of the Transfer of the Property should be as provided to the Tribunal by the Applicant.

That the Applicant shall pay the purchase price into Court pursuant to s27(5) of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.

The Application

1. The Applicant, [APPELLANT] [NAME], issued an application on the 23 February 2022 for an order vesting in him the freehold of Kamiros (Edgebank House), [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the property). An order was made by District Judge Blakeborough in the County Court at Stockport on the 20 May 2022 that: a. The Applicant place an advisement in the [NAME] to trace the freehold owner of the property. b. The Applicant makes an application to this Tribunal under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (the Act), s.21 for a determination of the provisions which ought to be contained in the Transfer of the Property to the Applicant and the determine the price payable and the correct basis of valuation under section 9 of the Act.

2. Having placed the advisement, the Applicant made the application to the Tribunal. Directions were made on 03 August 2022 for the Applicant to provide a statement of case, and any valuation evidence and a draft transfer.

3. The Application was listed to be determined on the papers alone and without an inspection of the Property.

The Evidence

4. The evidence provided by the Applicant included: a. The Lease b. The Judgment of the Court c. The Register of Title d. A valuation e. and appraisal of the property, dated 25 August 2022, undertaken by [NAME], and reviewed by [NAME], both MRICS and RICS Registered Valuers working for [NAME], Chartered Surveyors. The valuation was undertaken on a desktop basis.

5. The Lease is for 999 years from 25 December 1906. The ground rent is peppercorn (if demanded).

6. The valuation having work through three elements of s.9 of the Act: a. The capitalised value of the existing lease ground rent; b. The capitalised value of the modern ground rent; and, c. The value of the freehold as reversion at the expiry of the new extended lease, concluded that the best consideration to be £0 (nil pounds)

The Determination

7. We concur with the valuation provided by Applicant and determine that the purchase price for the freehold interest of Kamiros (Edgebank House), [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] is £0 (nil pounds).

8. The Applicant also provided a draft Transfer document (TR1) at pages 120 – 122 of his bundle. We approve that document.

C Hunter Tribunal Judge 25 October 2022

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The valuation of the freehold interest was determined to be nil pounds.
  • The valuation considered the capitalised value of the existing lease ground rent.
  • The valuation considered the capitalised value of the modern ground rent.
  • The valuation considered the value of the freehold as reversion at the expiry of the new extended lease.
  • The Tribunal approved the draft Transfer document provided by the applicant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The purchase price for the freehold interest of a property was determined to be nil pounds.

Who was involved?

The applicant sought to acquire the freehold interest of a property, while persons unknown were listed as respondents.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on a valuation report that considered various factors related to the property's value.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 was applied, particularly sections dealing with the valuation process.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The valuation report concluded that the best consideration for the freehold interest was nil pounds.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was in favour of the applicant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may also find that the valuation of their property results in a nil pounds purchase price.

What evidence or documents mattered?

The valuation report, including appraisals and reviews by registered valuers, was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.