
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal reviewed the reasonableness of service charges claimed by a landlord for several years. The applicant, a tenant, argued that the handover between landlords was not transparent and that there was an element of double counting in the service charges. However, the Tribunal found the service charges to be reasonable under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that leaseholders of certain flats must pay service charges for repairing a jetty near their property. The decision was based on the terms of their leases and historical payments for similar repairs.
The First-tier Tribunal granted permission for a landlord to enter into a long-term service provider contract without consulting the tenants, as no prejudice was identified.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy. This means the rent was set according to the Housing Act 1988, ensuring fair treatment for tenants.
The First-tier Tribunal granted rent repayment orders to tenants who lived in an unlicensed HMO. The landlord failed to obtain necessary licenses and was responsible for unsafe conditions, leading to a fire and subsequent evacuation to another unlicensed HMO. The orders were made under the Housing and Planning Act 2016 and the Housing Act 2004.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled on the reasonableness of service charges and administration fees in a residential property dispute. The Tribunal considered various charges and determined their legality based on the lease and applicable laws.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled on the reasonableness and payability of service charges and administration charges under the a person Act 1985 and Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The Tribunal determined certain service charges to be reasonable and payable, while limiting others and extinguishing an administration charge.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the value of the freehold interest is zero because there is no ground rent and the lease term is very long.
A tenant successfully challenged a local authority's denial of their Right to Buy claim. The court ruled that the property was not particularly suitable for elderly persons, allowing the tenant to proceed with their claim.