VadeLab
DismissedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Value at Nil

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that the value of the freehold interest is zero because there is no ground rent and the lease term is very long.

⚖️ Legal holding

Where there is no ground rent payable and the lease term is extremely long, the value of the freehold interest is nil.

Topics

freehold enfranchisementleasehold reform act

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined that the price for the freehold interest is nil due to the long lease term and lack of ground rent.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined that the price payable for the freehold interest is nil due to the absence of ground rent and the extremely long lease term.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Dismissed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

:

CHI/18UE/OAF/2021/0018

Property

:

[ADDRESS], Lydiate lane, Lynton [POSTCODE]

Applicant: [redacted]

Representative

:

[APPELLANT]

Respondent: [redacted]

:

Freehold Enfranchisement under Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (Houses) (Missing Landlord)

Tribunal Member(s)

:

D Banfield FRICS Regional Surveyor

Date of Decision

:

5 August 2021

DECISION

The Tribunal determines that the price payable for the freehold interest is NIL

2 Background

1. By an Order of District Judge Scott sitting at the County Court at Barnstaple and dated 1 July 2021 the Tribunal is required to determine the price payable for the freehold interest.

2. Directions were made on 7 July 2021 indicating that the application would be dealt with on the papers without an oral hearing in accordance with Rule 31 of the Tribunal’s Procedural Rules unless the Applicant objected in writing within 28 days of the date of receipt of the directions.

3. A hearing bundle was ordered which was required to include a valuation of the freehold interest to be conducted by an [NAME].

4. A bundle has now been submitted and it is upon this that the tribunal has made its determination. Reference to pages within the bundle are shown as[x].

5. The Tribunal consider that an inspection of the property is not required.

6. The official copy of register of title [20] DN324970 indicates that the property is held on a lease for 999 years from 29 September 1895 and includes other land. A rent of £150 pa was stated however it is noted that by an Assignment dated 15 October 1921 the land in this title was informally exonerated from the rent reserved.

7. An [NAME] report dated 12 July 2021 has been prepared by Mr [NAME] [2] in which he confirms that he has complied with the required RICS Practice Statement and Guidance Note.

The Law

8. Section 27(5) of the Act provides: The appropriate sum which in accordance with Section 27(3) of the Act to be paid in to Court is the aggregate of: a. Such amount as may be determined by (or on appeal from) the appropriate Tribunal to be the price payable in accordance with Section 9 above; and b. The amount or estimated amount (as so determined) of any pecuniary rent payable for the house and premises up to the date of the Conveyance which remains unpaid.

9. Section 9 of the Act sets out in detail the assumptions to be made and the procedure to be followed in carrying out the valuation. The effect of Section 27(1) is that the valuation date is the date on which the application was made to the Court.

3 Evidence

10. Mr [NAME] values the freehold interest in accordance with Section 9 of the Leasehold reform Act 1967 at NIL.

11. He describes the property as being of stone construction with a later blockwork extension. The accommodation as indicated on a plan [18] comprises Sitting room, kitchen and garage at ground floor, 2 bedrooms, shower room and roof terrace at first floor and a further bedroom and bathroom on the top floor.

12. Mr [NAME] values the existing lease ground rent as nil there being no rent payable.

13. He then takes the modern ground rent as £3,600 based on a cleared site value of £60,000. This sum he capitalizes at 6% and then defers the result for 923 years arriving at a nil value.

14. Finally, he values the Freeholder’s reversion after 923 years based on his valuation of the long leasehold value at £190,000 which when deferred for 923 years results in a nil value.

15. In summary therefore Mr [NAME] place a nil value on the freehold interest.

Decision

16. Given the length of the reversion and that no ground rent is payable it is unnecessary for me to examine the constituent parts of Mr [NAME] valuation in detail. I am however able to confirm that his valuation is adopted and the Tribunal determines that the price payable for the freehold interest is NIL.

D Banfield FRICS 5 August 2021

4 RIGHTS OF APPEAL

1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.

2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.

3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.

4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The freehold interest was valued at nil because no ground rent is currently payable.
  • The freehold interest was valued at nil due to the extremely long remaining lease term.
  • The tribunal adopted the valuation report that determined the freehold interest to be nil.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal decided that the price for the freehold interest is nil.

Who was involved?

The applicant sought the freehold interest while the respondent was unknown.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the lack of ground rent and the extremely long lease term.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the absence of ground rent and the long lease term.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was against the person who brought the case.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation might also find their freehold interest valued at nil.

What evidence or documents mattered?

An expert report on the valuation of the freehold interest was crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.