First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Price at £6.00
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the price for the freehold and head leasehold interests is £6.00, following a valuation process under the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
⚖️ Legal holding
The appropriate sum to be paid for the freehold and head leasehold interests is determined according to the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal valued the freehold and head leasehold interests at £6.00 based on a detailed valuation process.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the price for the freehold and head leasehold interests at £6.00 based on a valuation report and the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
:
CHI/23UC/OAF/2021/0022
Property
:
1A [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Applicant: [redacted] [APPELLANT]
:
[NAME]
Respondent: [redacted]
:
Section 27 Leasehold Reform Act 1967 (Missing Landlord)
Tribunal Member(s)
:
D Banfield FRICS Regional Surveyor
Date of Decision
:
13 October 2021
DECISION
The Tribunal determines that the price to be paid for the freehold interest is £6.00
The Tribunal determines that the amount of unpaid pecuniary rent (if any) payable for the property up to the date of the proposed conveyance is nil.
2 Background
1. By an Order of Judge Dobson sitting as a Judge of the County Court exercising the jurisdiction of a District Judge sitting at Havant Justice Centre on 19 August 2021 the Court issued a Vesting Order under section 27 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967 for the sale of the freehold of the Property to the Claimants on such terms as may be determined by the First-tier Tribunal.
2. By the same Order the Court directed that the matter be transferred to the First-tier Tribunal to determine the price payable for a conveyance under the provisions of Section 21 of the Leasehold Reform Act 1967. The Tribunal is therefore required to determine the price payable for both the freehold and head-leasehold interests in the Property.
3. The Tribunal made Directions on 3 September 2021 setting out the information required to enable it to make its determination and a bundle has now been received containing a valuation report from [NAME] MA dated 4 October 2021. An inspection of the property has not been made.
The Lease
4. The site is identified on the HM Land Registry plan edged red under title number GR336875 and is held by way of an Underlease dated 20 January 1909 between [NAME] and [NAME] demising a term of 1000 years (less one day) from 19 March 1707 reserving a yearly ground rent of 1s 6d. The superior lease is dated 19 March 1707 between [NAME] and [NAME] demising a term of 1000 years from the same date reserving a yearly rent of 2s.
The Law
5. Section 27(5) of the Act provides: The appropriate sum which in accordance with Section 27(3) of the Act to be paid in to Court is the aggregate of: a. Such amount as may be determined by (or on appeal from) the appropriate Tribunal to be the price payable in accordance with Section 9 above; and b. The amount or estimated amount (as so determined) of any pecuniary rent payable for the house and premises up to the date of the Conveyance which remains unpaid.
6. Section 9 of the Act sets out in detail the assumptions to be made and the procedure to be followed in carrying out the valuation. The effect of Section 27(1) is that the valuation date is the date on which the application was made to the Court.
7. There are various bases set out in Section 9 of the Act and the Tribunal determines that the appropriate basis is in Subsection 9(1) being that
3 on 31 March 1990 the Rateable value of the house and premises was not above £500.
The Premises
8. The property comprises a detached three-bedroom bungalow built in 1983 and extended in 1997.There is a separate side garage the front half of which is part of this demise the rear part falling within the demise of the neighbouring property.
Evidence and Decision
9. In his valuation report Mr [NAME] has determined that the value for the purposes of Section 9 of The Act is £6.00.
10. Mr [NAME] made his determination of the Freehold value by capitalising the ground rent at 10% for 685.80 years arriving at £0.25 to which he added the value of the reversion based on an open market value of the property of £375,000, a site value proportion of 33.00% (£123,750) a modern ground rent at 4.75% (£5,878.13), a YP of 50 years at 4.75% deferred 685.80 years plus a Haresign addition of £375,000 deferred for 735.80 years at 4.75% . This produced the rounded sum of £0.25.
11. Mr [NAME] determination of the Head Leasehold interest was on the “Minor Superior Tenancy” basis the price of which is calculated on a set formula and in this instance amounts to £5.43.
12. Adding the value of the two interests Mr [NAME] arrives at his rounded figure of £6.00.
13. Mr [NAME] bases his open market value on the sale of three houses in [ADDRESS] with values ranging between £315,000 and £352,000.
14. The Tribunal accepts Mr [NAME] valuation as a fair reflection of the price and determines that the price to be paid for the Freehold and Head Leasehold interests is £6.00
15. The Tribunal determines that the amount of unpaid pecuniary rent (if any) payable for the property up to the date of the proposed conveyance is nil.
D Banfield FRICS
13 October 2021
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application by email to [EMAIL] to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case.
4
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28 day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28 day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Valuation at £6.00
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value at £150
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Interest Price at £116.00
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Price
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Approves Freehold Interest Valuation
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Interest Price
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Valuation at £300
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Leasehold Property Purchase Price at £60
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Reversion Value Under Leasehold Ref…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Entitled to Purchase Freehold Interest for £100 Due to Low Ground Re…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Freehold Price and Unpaid Rent
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Freehold Interest Price at £5,500
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The appropriate sum to be paid for the freehold interest is determined according to the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
- Tenants are entitled to a fair valuation for the freehold interest under the Act.
- The valuation process must comply with the requirements set forth in the Act.
- Unpaid ground rent is included in the sum to be paid for the freehold interest.
- The price for the freehold interest is determined by the Tribunal based on provided valuations.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- (No factors identified as leading to unfavorable outcomes in the provided cases.)
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the price for the freehold and head leasehold interests at £6.00.
Who was involved?
The claimants and an unknown respondent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court accepted the valuation report and determined the price based on the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Leasehold Reform Act 1967 sections 27 and 9.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The valuation report provided by a professional surveyor was critical.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was in favour of the claimants.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should follow the valuation process outlined in the Leasehold Reform Act 1967.
What evidence or documents mattered?
The valuation report and the lease documents were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a person can appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving leasehold reform.
