
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal reduced service charges for a tenant due to breaches of consultation requirements under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985. The Tribunal granted partial dispensation from consultation requirements for certain works but reduced service charges due to breaches of consultation requirements.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that a tenant can buy the freehold of their property under the Leasehold Reform Act. They inspected the property and looked at recent sales to figure out how much the freehold is worth. The decision was made by Judge a person on January 28, 2020.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that a tenant must pay reasonable costs to the landlord when extending a lease. The Tribunal accepted the landlord's costs as reasonable and in line with the statutory requirements.
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the period for which an entry in the a person of rogue landlords and property agents will be maintained from five to two years, emphasising the importance of proportionality in such decisions.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant's challenge to the reasonableness of service charges and administration charges was valid under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 and the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002. The tribunal decided that the service charges were reasonable and upheld the administration charges.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant must pay a service charge of £26,141.33 for the financial year 2019-2020, rejecting claims of breach of lease due to water leaks.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the legal costs that a tenant must pay to a landlord for a lease extension. The costs were set at £3,588.00 including VAT, based on the requirements of the 1993 Act.
The First-tier Tribunal granted rent repayment orders to tenants because the landlord failed to obtain the necessary licenses for the property. The Tribunal ruled that the landlord must repay the rent to the tenants.
Tenants successfully obtained rent repayment orders because the landlord failed to license the property as required by law. The case highlights the importance of proper licensing for rental properties.
Tenants successfully obtained a rent repayment order from the First-tier Tribunal because their landlord failed to license the property as required by law. The property was in an area that needed additional and selective licensing, but the landlord did not obtain the necessary licenses. As a result, the tenants were awarded a refund of their rent.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the property's condition and recent improvements. The decision was based on the open market value of the property.