
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The First-tier Tribunal allowed a management company to bypass the usual consultation process for dealing with dry rot, ensuring that the a person wouldn't face any financial harm.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the rent for an assured tenancy. They considered market comparables and the property's condition, adjusting the rent to a lower amount.
The First-tier Tribunal adjusted the management fees to exclude costs already covered by office expenses, ensuring that service charges are reasonable and comply with the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that a tenant violated noise nuisance clauses in their lease due to ongoing disturbances and loud gatherings. The ruling was based on evidence of noise complaints and inspections.
In this case, the claimant argued that he did not receive proper notice of service charges for certain years. However, the Tribunal ruled that he had indeed received adequate notice, thus upholding the service charge demands.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled that certain service charges were reasonable and payable according to the terms of the lease and the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on a fair rent for a property, setting it at £78.00 per week. This decision was based on calculations involving the Retail Price Index and relevant legislation under the Rent Act 1977.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on the maximum fair rent for a property, setting it at £123 per week. This ensures the tenant pays a fair amount as required by the Rent Act 1977.
In this case, a tenant successfully argued that the landlord should pay back the costs incurred due to a dispute over service charges. The tribunal found that the landlord had not followed the lease agreement correctly, leading to the tenant's victory.
The First-tier Tribunal reduced a financial penalty from £26,250 to £4,000 for a landlord who failed to comply with a person on time. The reduction was due to mitigating factors such as the landlord's engagement with the tenant and the absence of direct gain from the delay.
In a recent case heard by the First-tier Tribunal, a tenant successfully recovered a person charges, ground rent, and contractual costs from the landlord as specified in their lease agreement. The decision was handed down on 22 January 2020.
The First-tier Tribunal dismissed claims of breach of covenant by several tenants, ruling in favour of the tenants based on compliance with lease terms and providing reasonable access to the headlesses.