
Housing & Tenancy judgments from UK courts and tribunals, with a plain-English summary, the legal holding and frequently asked questions.
The Tribunal decided on the market rent for a property under an assured periodic tenancy. They considered the property's condition and the market conditions on the proposed rental increase date. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988 s.14.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled that service charges for tenants were unreasonable and ordered reductions. The Tribunal also required the landlord to pay a portion of the tribunal fees to the tenants.
The Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for an assured periodic tenancy, considering the open market value and specific conditions of the tenancy.
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent of £905 per month for a tenant's property. The decision took into account the tenant's provision of items like carpets and curtains, as well as the property's condition.
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,705 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after reviewing comparable evidence and local rental values. The decision took effect from 21st June 2025.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that a person Housing Group is not an a person for a person because they do not have a legal estate in the common parts and are not under a repairing obligation for those parts. This decision was made under the Building Safety Act 2022.
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) evaluated a collective enfranchisement claim for acquiring the freehold of a property. The Tribunal considered the value of a proposed rooftop development and related costs, including deductions for development expenses and heating system issues.
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) ruled that tenants are not required to pay service charges for costs incurred in defending against High Court proceedings. The decision applies to both legal costs and administration charges related to non-payment of service charges.
The First-tier Tribunal ruled on the validity of service charges and administration charges under a lease agreement, ensuring compliance with the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 and the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002.
The First-tier Tribunal decided that the service charges for a multi-flat property were reasonable and properly incurred, based on the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The First-tier Tribunal granted a landlord dispensation from full compliance with consultation requirements due to exceptional circumstances involving a third-party contractor's insolvency and difficulties in obtaining multiple estimates.