Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy Based on Market Conditions
📌 In brief
The Tribunal decided on a new rent of £1,535 per month for an assured periodic tenancy after considering comparable evidence and market conditions. The decision was based on a referral under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair rent determination based on comparable evidence and market conditions.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing a new rent increase. The notice must specify a new period for the tenancy starting at least two months after the notice is served. The section also outlines specific dates for subsequent rent increases.
A tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under an assured tenancy. The tribunal will determine a fair rent based on open-market conditions, considering the same terms and conditions as the original tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and market conditions.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,535 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, taking into account comparable evidence and market conditions. The decision was made following a referral under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. GB/LON/00BB/MNR/2024/0285
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were Flat 83 [NAME], 21 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Mr O Dowty MRICS Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord [COMPANY] 1-7 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1,535 Per Cal Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 May 2024
3. The amount included for services is
£60 Per Cal Month
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 May 2018
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord – save internal decs
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Bed, wardrobe, sofa, tables, chairs, white goods.
8. Description of premises 1 bed flat without balcony on 8th floor of modern, lifted, purpose-built building.
Chairman Mr O Dowty MRICS Date of Decision 25 July 2025
(c)
1
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : GB/LON/00BB/MNR/2024/0285 Property : Flat 83, [NAME], 21 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : [NAME] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 25 July 2025 – 10 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Date of Summary Reasons : 29 July 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,535 per calendar month with effect from 1 May 2024. ____________________________________
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 8 March 2024 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,615 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,410 per month to take effect from 1 May 2024.
2. Under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 18 April 2024.
(c)
2 3. Unfortunately, at first the Tribunal’s administration incorrectly recorded the date of receipt of the referral as having been 12 July 2024. This led to the Tribunal striking the case out for want of jurisdiction, in a decision dated 25 October 2024; before – in response to the tenant’s seeking an appeal and clarifying the date the matter was referred to the Tribunal – setting aside that decision (and thereby reinstating the application) in a decision dated 18 November 2024.
Inspection 4. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 5. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord.
Determination and Valuation 6. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would have been in the region of £1,615 per calendar month at the proposed date of increase 1 May 2024.
7. From this level of rent we have made an adjustment of 5% to reflect the lease terms at the property being less attractive to a potential tenant than would generally be expected in the market as regards internal decorations.
8. The full valuation is show below:
9. The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,535 per calendar month.
Decision
10. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,535 per calendar month.
11. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,535 per calendar month to take effect on 1 May 2024; This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. Chairman: Mr O Dowty MRICS Date: 29 July 2025
(c)
3
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment for Assured Tenancy: Factors Considered
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Proposed Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decision
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent of £1,800 for Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tenant Wins Reduced Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Market Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £2,400 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent based on comparable evidence.
- The rent should be adjusted according to the property's condition.
- Health and safety compliance can affect the fair rent.
- Improvements made by the tenant can influence the fair rent.
- Disrepair in the property can lead to a reduced rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,535 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable evidence and market conditions, as required by the Housing Act 1988.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988, specifically Sections 13 and 14, were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the comparable evidence and market conditions presented by both parties.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant who brought the case.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also refer their case to the Tribunal for a fair rent determination based on comparable evidence and market conditions.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Comparable evidence and market conditions were crucial in determining the new rent.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed through the appropriate channels.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent determination.
