First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £800 to £540 because of several health and safety issues found in the property. This decision helps ensure tenants live in safe conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent adjustment based on health and safety compliance issues.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive in the open market. This includes considering the terms of the tenancy and any relevant improvements or failures to comply with the tenancy terms.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent after considering health and safety issues.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent of £800 to £540 after considering health and safety issues raised by Newham Council. The decision took effect on 29 August 2025.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BB/MNR/2025/0935
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [NAME] 54 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 540.00 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 29 August 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable - Per -
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 29 May 2021
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement.
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Wardrobe, chest of drawers and one desk
9. Description of premises This is a large, converted house which has 7 bedrooms which are separately let out. The property has a bathroom, kitchen and small shower room.
[NAME] of Decision 1 December 2025
(c)
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00BB/MNR/2025/0935 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT] [NAME] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mrs [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Date of Summary Reasons : 1 December 2025
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £540.00 per calendar month with effect from 29 August 2025. ____________________________________
SUMMARY REASONS
2 Background 1. On 16 July 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £800.00 in place of the existing rent of £675.00 per month to take effect from 29 August 2025.
2. On 8 August 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 11 August 2025. Inspection 3. Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant. The Landlord has not provided any written submissions to the Tribunal. Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £725 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: A number of health and safety items identified by Newham Council including: • The lack of a fitted automatic fire detection and alarm system. • Non-compliant bedroom doors. • No fire blanket being present in the kitchen. • Lack of emergency lighting and fire safety / exit signs in communal areas. • Kitchen door not having adequate safety components.
3
6. The full valuation is shown below:
per calendar month Market Rent
£725
Less Non-compliant issues raised by Newham )
25%
£181.25
£543.75
Say £540.00
7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £540 per calendar month. Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £540 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £540 to take effect on 29 August 2025, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 1 December 2025
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Health and Safety Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Statutory Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy - First-tier Tribunal Decis…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Based on Property Condition and Location
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the specific conditions of their property.
- Rent adjustments are granted when there are health and safety compliance issues.
- Fair market rent is determined based on comparable rental evidence and the condition of the premises.
- Rent reductions are granted due to ongoing property defects.
- Fair rent determination takes into account the tenant's responsibilities.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent from £800 to £540.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the rent after considering health and safety issues raised by Newham Council.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the presence of health and safety issues in the property.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to get their rent adjusted if there are significant health and safety issues in their property.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Health and safety reports from Newham Council were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed, but the process varies depending on the circumstances.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
