First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Defects
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal reduced the proposed rent from £1,250 to £1,200 per month because the property had several defects, such as a broken window and a non-working bathroom heater. This decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a rent reduction due to ongoing property defects.
📖 What the law says
This section allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. When making such a determination, the tribunal considers the rent at which the dwelling house might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord, taking into account various factors and disregarding certain effects on the rent, such as improvements made by the tenant or reductions due to the tenant's failure to comply with the terms of the tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to account for property defects.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined that the proposed rent of £1,250 per month should be reduced to £1,200 per month due to ongoing property defects, including a defective window and a non-functioning bathroom heater. The decision was based on the Housing Act 1988 s.14.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0793
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 415 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Mr I [NAME] [NAME] Judge Cowan
Landlord [NAME] & [NAME] c/o [COMPANY], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1,200.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 14 December 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 14 December 2000
5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord • 1x bed, 1x drawers, 2x small side tables, 1x 2 seat sofa, 1x tv stand, 1x small dining table with 4 chairs, 1x coffee table.
8. Description of premises 4th floor flat comprising Living/Dining/Kitchen, Bedroom, Bathroom with WC
Chairman
Mr I [NAME] of Decision 12 December 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0793 Property : 415 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :
None
Respondent Landlord : [NAME] : [RESPONDENT] of Application :
Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members : [NAME] [NAME] Judge Cowan
Date of Application : 16th October 2025 Date of Decision : 12th December 2025
DECISION
HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0793
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. On 19th September 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,250 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,100 per month to take effect from 14th December 2025.
2. On 16th October 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Notice was emailed on 17th October 2025. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence
4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord’s Agent which had been copied to the opposing party. Determination and Valuation 5. Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,250 per calendar month.
6. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.
7. In this case the property is not let in such condition as there are a number of defects as listed by the Tenant including a defective window and a non- functioning bathroom heater. These have been notified to the Landlord’s Agent but no action has been taken to effect any repair.
8.
Accordingly, the Tribunal determines that the full open market rent of £1,250 should be reduced by £50 per month to reflect these ongoing defects.
9. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,200 per month.
10. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
11.
Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,200 per month should take effect from 14th December 2025 this being the date specified in the notice.
HAV/24UB/MNR/2025/0793
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Damaged HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Rent at £700 per Month for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Statutory Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £1350 monthly rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined that the open market rent for the property in good condition would be £1,250 per month.
- The landlord's agent was notified of the defects but did not repair them.
- The rent was reduced by £50 per month due to the ongoing defects.
- The new rent of £1,200 per month will take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The rent was reduced from £1,250 to £1,200 per month due to property defects.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to reduce the rent because the property had ongoing defects that affected its value.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the presence of ongoing property defects.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also be able to negotiate a lower rent if their property has significant defects.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties and information freely available on the internet were considered.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions like this can be appealed if the losing party requests full reasons and follows the proper procedures.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent adjustments.
