VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent After Considering Property Repairs

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) set a new monthly rent of £750 for an assured periodic tenancy after considering the current state of repairs in the property. The tribunal adjusted the full market rent to reflect the need for repairs before setting the final amount.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord may adjust the proposed new rent to account for repair issues in the property when determining a market rent under Section 14 of the Housing Act 1988.

Topics

tenancyrent determinationrepair liabilities

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the open-market rent, considering the reasonable expectation of what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under an assured periodic tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on comparable evidence and property condition.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a market rent of £750 per month for an assured periodic tenancy, adjusting the full open market rent to account for repair issues in the property. The decision was based on comparable evidence and the condition of the premises.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/29UC/MNR/2025/0824

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT] E [RESPONDENT]

Landlord [RESPONDENT], 80 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 750.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 11 December 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 11 December 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises Second floor one-bedroom flat

[NAME] of Decision 14 January 2026

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2026

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/29UC/MNR/2025/0824 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mr [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord :

[RESPONDENT] : [COUNSEL] & [NAME] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Application : 22nd November 2025 Date of Decision : 14th January 2026

DECISION

HAV/29UC/MNR/2025/0824

SUMMARY

REASONS Decision The Tribunal determines a Market Rent of £750 per month with effect from 11th December 2025. Background 1. On 16th October 2025 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £750 per month in place of the existing rent of £650 per month to take effect from 11th December 2025.

2. The present tenancy commenced 11th December 2020 at £650 per month.

3. On 22nd November 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 23rd November 2025.

4. On 16th December 2025 directions were issued for the parties to make representations by specified dates. The Landlord’s Agent made a Case Management Application to extend the date for submission of their statement to 6th January 2026. This was approved by the Tribunal on 9th January 2026. Inspection 5. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

6. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord’s Agent. Determination and Valuation 7. Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition and at the date specified in the notice would be £800 per calendar month/week.

8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord.

9. In this case the Landlord’s Agent recognises that there is a hole in the bath which is to be replaced and that there is a damp issue in the bathroom which will need involvement from the block management company.

HAV/29UC/MNR/2025/0824

10. Accordingly, the Tribunal has adjusted the full ‘open market rent’ to account for these repair issues. 11. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £800 Less deductions for:- General wants of repair to bath and bathroom wall/ceiling. £50

____ TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£750

12. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £750 per month.

13. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.

14.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £750 per month should take effect from 11th December 2025, this being the date specified in the notice.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The rent should be adjusted based on the property's condition.
  • The rent should be set at a reasonable market rate.
  • Significant issues with the property's condition allow for a fair deduction from the proposed rent.
  • Tenants can refer a landlord's notice of rent increase to the tribunal for a fair determination.
  • Rent adjustments must consider both current market rates and the specific condition of the property.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The First-tier Tribunal set a new monthly rent of £750 for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the dispute over the market rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal considered comparable evidence and property condition to set a fair rent that reflects repair issues.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was used to determine the market rent.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The need for repairs in the property influenced the final rent determination.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The tenant's request for a lower rent was partially successful, as the tribunal adjusted the full market rent downward.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants and landlords should consider property condition when determining fair rental prices.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparable rental data and information about the property's repair status were crucial.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal if they disagree with the tribunal's decision within one month.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.