First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £700 per Month
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £700 per month for a tenant in an assured periodic tenancy. The tribunal considered both current market conditions and the specific state of the property to reach its decision.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant's rent under an assured periodic tenancy is set by considering both current market rates and the specific condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord might expect to receive for letting the property in the open market. This determination considers the periodic nature of the tenancy, the start date of the new period, and the terms of the tenancy excluding the rent amount.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and property condition.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a rent of £700 per calendar month for an assured periodic tenancy, considering market rates and the property's condition. The decision was based on evidence provided by both parties and expert knowledge.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/00MS/MNR/2025/0827
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 82 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 700.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 5 January 2026
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 2008
5. Length of the term or rental period Statutory periodic tenancy
6. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with agreement
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None
8. Description of premises An 11th floor flat forming part of a 14 storey local authority tower block. Accommodation comprises: bedroom, living room, kitchen, bathroom.
[NAME] of Decision 13 February 2026
1
Case Reference
: HAV/00MS/MNR/2025/0827
Property : 82 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
: [COUNSEL] : None
Landlord : [COUNSEL] : None
Date of Objection : 18 November 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Summary Reasons : 13 February 2026
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £700 per calendar month with effect from 5 January 2026. ____________________________________
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background
1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 dated 11 November 2025 which proposed a new rent of £700 per month in place of the existing rent of £460 per month to take effect from 5 January 2026. This being an increase of £240 per month.
2. On the 18 November 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3.On the 6 January 2026, the Tribunal prepared Directions for the conduct of the case.
4. The parties did not request a hearing or an inspection, and the Tribunal agreed with this arrangement. Therefore, this case was considered on the basis of the papers provided by the parties with the assistance of Rightmove and Google Maps.
Evidence
5. The Tribunal did not receive any completed witness statements from landlord or the tenant. The landlord provided photographs of the block and internal rooms. The parties also did not produce evidence in connection with comparable rental values in the area.
Determination and Valuation
6. Having consideration of the very limited evidence provided by the parties and our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Southampton area area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good lettable condition with modern fittings and services would be £775 per month.
7. Next, the Tribunal needs to adjust that hypothetical rent of £775 per month to allow for the dated kitchen and bathroom fittings and decorations.
8.The Tribunal has considered very carefully the evidence provided in the photographs. Using its own expertise, the Tribunal considers that a deduction of £75 per month from the hypothetical rent. This reduces the figure to £700 per month.
9. It should be noted that this figure cannot be a simple arithmetical calculation and is not based upon capital costs but is the Tribunal’s estimate of the amount by which the rent would need to be reduced to attract a tenant.
3
Decision
8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy in its current condition was £700 per calendar month.
10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £700 per month to take effect on the 12 December 2025. This being the date in the Landlord’s notice.
Chairman: [NAME]: 13 February 2026
APPEAL PROVISIONS
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Statutory Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Damaged HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Adjustment Case: Property Condition and Financial Hardship Considered
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Refurbished Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent After Considering Property Repairs
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £800 PCM for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal used its expert knowledge of rental values in the Southampton area to determine the market rent.
- The Tribunal considered the property's dated kitchen, bathroom fittings, and decorations when adjusting the hypothetical rent.
- The Tribunal made a deduction of £75 per month from the hypothetical rent due to the property's condition.
- The Tribunal's estimate of the rent reduction was based on what would attract a tenant, not capital costs.
- The new rent of £700 per month was directed to take effect from the date specified in the landlord's notice.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The parties failed to produce evidence related to comparable rental values in the area.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set the rent at £700 per month for a tenant's assured periodic tenancy.
Who was involved?
A landlord and a tenant were involved in setting the rental price.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal reviewed evidence about market rates and property condition to determine the fair rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 was used to set the rent for an assured periodic tenancy.
What argument mattered most?
Evidence showing current rental prices in the area and the property's condition influenced the decision.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The tenant's request was partially granted, as the rent increase was lower than proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants can challenge proposed rent increases based on market conditions and property state.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and information about comparable rental prices were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party may appeal if they disagree with the tribunal's decision.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to consult a qualified solicitor for advice on your specific situation.
