VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a property, taking into account the property's condition and the presence of items left by the previous tenant. The rent was set at £1,600 per month.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property, adjusted for the condition and contents of the property.

Topics

tenancy disputesmarket rent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent for the property, considering factors such as the condition and contents of the property.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a market rent of £1,600 for a property, adjusting the open market rent of £1,800 to account for the presence of previous tenant's belongings and general repairs needed.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/29UM/MNR/2025/0804

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 48 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME] Miss [RESPONDENT]

Landlord Ms [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant Ms [APPELLANT] [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 1,600.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 December 2025

3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a

4. Date assured tenancy commenced 1 March 2020

5. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord

7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord

8. Description of premises Modern 4-bedroom detached house.

[NAME] of Decision 31 December 2025

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/29UM/MNR/2025/0804 Property : 48 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Mrs [COUNSEL] :

None

Respondent Landlord : Mrs [COUNSEL] : [COUNSEL] of Application :

Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Ms [NAME] D [NAME] of Application : 2nd November 2025 Date of Decision : 31st December 2025

DECISION

HAV/29UM/MNR/2025/0804

SUMMARY REASONS

Decision The Tribunal determines a Market Rent of £1,600 from 1st December 2025.

Background 1. On 31st October 2025 the Landlord’s Agent served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,750 per month in place of the existing rent of £920.83 per month to take effect from 1st December 2025.

2. On 2nd November 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case based on the papers provided by the parties and information freely available on the internet. Evidence

4. The Tribunal has considered the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation 5. The Tribunal notes that the Landlord is the mother of the Tenant and the previous Tenant was Mrs [APPELLANT] brother. The property was initially let to Mrs [NAME] at a concessionary rent. This relationship has no bearing on the Parties’ rights and responsibilities as Landlord and Tenant and is not taken into account by the Tribunal.

6. The submissions provided to the Tribunal include information detailing personal circumstances of the Parties. In accordance with the appropriate legislation these are not taken into account by the Tribunal in reaching its decision.

7. Having given consideration to the comparable evidence provided by the parties and of its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, the Tribunal determines that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be £1,800 per calendar month.

8. Such a tenancy would normally include white goods, carpets, curtains/blinds and associated fittings to all be provided by the Landlord, and the Tenant would have the benefit of sole use of the property for herself and her son.

HAV/29UM/MNR/2025/0804

9. In this case the property is not let in such condition so some adjustments to the ‘open market rent’ are necessary. In particular the Tribunal has made the adjustments for belongings of the previous Tenant (the Landlord’s son) being left in the property and for general wants of repair as detailed with supporting photographs.

10. The full valuation is shown below: Full open market rent in good condition £1,800 Less deductions for:- Previous Tenant’s belongings

£100 General wants of repair

£100

____ TOTAL RENT PAYABLE PER MONTH

£1,600

11. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under the terms of this assured tenancy was £1,600 per month.

12. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.

13.

Accordingly, the Tribunal directed that the new rent of £1,600 per month should take effect from 1st December 2025.

14. The Tribunal has not made an adjustment in rent to reflect the previous Tenant’s continued use of the electrical charging point. The Tenant should take independent advice regarding this intrusion. APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The market rent for the property in good condition was determined to be £1,800 per month.
  • A deduction of £100 was made because belongings of the previous tenant were left in the property.
  • A deduction of £100 was made for general wants of repair, supported by photographs.
  • The new rent of £1,600 per month was set to take effect from 1st December 2025.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set the market rent for the property at £1,600 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the current state of the property, making adjustments for the belongings of the previous tenant and necessary repairs.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988, specifically section 14, was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the need to adjust the open market rent based on the actual condition of the property.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than what the landlord had proposed.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation should consider the actual condition of their property when disputing a rent increase.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparative evidence and photographs of the property were important in the decision.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed if the appellant requests full reasons and follows the proper procedure.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is always recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for cases involving rent disputes.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.