First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Market Rent Based on Property Condition
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal set a market rent of £960 per month for a ground floor flat in Bexhill-on-Sea, adjusting the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and shortcomings.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent adjusted for the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, Section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the condition of the property and other relevant factors.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal adjusted the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and shortcomings.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined a market rent of £960 per month for a ground floor flat in Bexhill-on-Sea, adjusting the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and shortcomings.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0772
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Mr [RESPONDENT]
Landlord Mr [RESPONDENT] & Mrs [RESPONDENT] c/o [RESPONDENT], 25 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Tenant Mr [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ £960.00 Per Calendar Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 9 October 2025
3. The amount included for services is not applicable n/a Per n/a
4. Date assured tenancy commenced 9 October 2023
5. Length of the term or rental period 12 months
6. Allocation of liability for repairs Landlord
7. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Carpets, curtains, cooker, refrigerator
8. Description of premises Ground floor flat in a converted house: porch, a hallway, sitting room, kitchen, utility room, bedroom and bathroom. Outside garden area and store
[NAME] of Decision 10 November 2025
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2025
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0772 Property : [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Applicant Tenant : Miss [COUNSEL] : None Respondent Landlord : Mr [COUNSEL] & Mrs [COUNSEL] : Abbott and Abbott, Bexhill-on-Sea Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mr [NAME] Mr [NAME] of Inspection : None, determined on the papers
Date of Decision
:
10 November 2025
DECISION
HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0772 2 Summary of Decision
1. On 10 November 2025 the Tribunal determined a market rent of £960 per month to take effect from 9 October 2025.
Background 2. The case concerned the determination of a market rent for the subject property following a referral of the Landlord’s notice of increase of rent by the Tenant pursuant to sections 13 and 14 Housing Act 1988.
3. On 1 September 2025 [NAME] served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1000 per month, in place of the existing rent of £900 per month, to take effect from 9 October 2025. The notice complied with the legal requirements.
4. On 11 September 2025 the Tenant applied to the Tribunal under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988. The Application was dated 11 September 2025.
5. The Tribunal does not routinely consider it necessary and proportionate in cases of this nature to undertake inspections or hold Tribunal hearings unless either are specifically requested by either party or a particular point arises which merits such an inspection or hearing.
6. The Tribunal issued Directions on 3 October 2025 informing the parties that, unless either party objected, the Tribunal intended to determine the rent based on written representations; it also provided a blank rent appeal statement proforma for the parties to complete. The parties were invited to make submissions which could include photographs or videos.
7. Both parties submitted representations to the Tribunal.
8. Neither party objected to the matter being determined without an inspection or oral hearing, so the Tribunal determined the case on 10 November 2025 based on the written representations received.
9. These reasons address the key issues raised by the parties. They do not recite each and every point referred to either in submissions or during any hearing; however, this does not imply that any points raised, or documents not specifically mentioned were disregarded. If a point or document was referred to in the evidence or submissions that was relevant to a specific issue, then it was considered by the Tribunal. The Tribunal concentrates on those issues which, in its opinion, are fundamental to the application.
HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0772 3 The Law
S14 Determination of Rent by First-tier Tribunal
(1) Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to a First-tier Tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the Tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the Tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy-
(a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
(2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded-
(a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement- (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy.
(3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates, or the following conditions are satisfied, namely-
HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0772 4 (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit.
(4) In this section "rent" does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture, in respect of council tax or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation.
The Property 10. From the information given in the papers, the property comprises a ground floor flat in a converted house situated in a residential neighbourhood in Bexhill-on- Sea, a short distance from Collington Railway Station and Bexhill Beach. There are some local shops supplying day-to-day necessities, and more extensive facilities in the town centre.
11. The accommodation includes an enclosed, glazed front Porch, a Hallway, Sitting Room, Kitchen, Utility Room, Bedroom and Bathroom; the Landlord’s estimate of the floor area is 65.2m2. Outside there is a garden area and store.
12. The property has gas central heating, double glazing, carpets & curtains; in addition, a refrigerator and cooker are provided. Submissions 13. The tenancy began on 9 October 2023 at a rent of £900 per month.
14. The Landlord mentions recent extensive refurbishment works including windows, porch and electrical circuitry among other items. 15. [NAME] provides a collection of comparably sized properties elsewhere in Bexhill-on-Sea at asking rents ranging from £950 to £1095 per month.
16. The Tenant confirms the basic information about the accommodation and items included but states that the property is poorly maintained, especially in respect of continuous dampness and mould problems. The Tenant mentions that she is
HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0772 5 obliged to address the problem by regularly running a dehumidifier. She also mentions cracking to the ceiling and floors, and the burden of maintaining the garden, and that the provided white goods are in poor condition.
17. The Tenant provides a number of comparable properties offered to let locally having asking rents of between £775 to 975 per month.
18. Photographs of the property were included with the Tenant’s statement which illustrate the points made.
Consideration and Valuation
19. The Tribunal first considered whether it felt able to reasonably and fairly decide this case based on the papers submitted only with no oral hearing. Having read and considered the papers it decided that it could do so.
20. The Tribunal is required to determine the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under an assured tenancy. The personal circumstances of the Parties are not relevant to this issue.
21. Having carefully considered the representations from the parties and associated correspondence and using its own judgement and knowledge of rental values in Bexhill-on-Sea and surrounding areas, the Tribunal decided that the market rent for the subject property if let today in a condition that was usual for such an open market letting would be £1000 per month.
22. Such an open market letting would be for a tenantable property in good order with the Landlord responsible for internal decoration and on the basis that carpets, curtains and white goods would all be provided by the Landlord.
23. In the Tribunal’s view, appropriate adjustment to that amount would be required to reflect the Property’s circumstances and to reflect its shortcomings, and the Tribunal used its experience to do so. In particular an adjustment of £15/month for inadequate white goods and £25/month in respect of condition.
24. The Tenant made no representation that the starting date for the new rent specified in the Landlord’s notice would cause the Tenant undue hardship.
HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0772 6 Determination 25. The Tribunal therefore decided that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a [NAME] under the terms of this assured tenancy was £960 per month. 26. The Tribunal directed that the new rent of £960 per month should take effect from 9 October 2025 this being the date specified in the notice.
RIGHTS OF APPEAL
1. A person wishing to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) must seek permission to do so by making written application to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional office which has been dealing with the case. Where possible you should send your application for permission to appeal by email to [EMAIL] as this will enable the First-tier Tribunal Regional office to deal with it more efficiently.
2. The application must arrive at the Tribunal within 28 days after the Tribunal sends to the person making the application written reasons for the decision.
3. If the person wishing to appeal does not comply with the 28-day time limit, the person shall include with the application for permission to appeal a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then decide whether to extend time or not to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed.
4. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates, state the grounds of appeal, and state the result the party making the application is seeking.
5. Either party seeking to appeal a decision are referred to form RPPTA.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent Based on Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 Due to Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Semi-Detached House in Buckfastleigh
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Adjusts Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal determined a market rent of £960 per month for the property.
- The landlord's notice proposing a new rent of £1000 per month complied with legal requirements.
- The Tribunal could fairly decide the case based on written submissions without an oral hearing.
- The market rent for the property in usual open market condition would be £1000 per month.
- An adjustment of £15 per month was made for inadequate white goods.
- An adjustment of £25 per month was made due to the property's condition.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant did not claim that the new rent's starting date would cause undue hardship.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set a market rent of £960 per month for a ground floor flat in Bexhill-on-Sea.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided to adjust the proposed rent to reflect the property's condition and shortcomings.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 s.14 was applied to determine the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The argument that mattered most was the condition of the property and the need to adjust the rent accordingly.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, who argued that the property's condition warranted a lower rent.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation should ensure that the property's condition is taken into account when determining the market rent.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs of the property and statements from both the tenant and the landlord were important pieces of evidence.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is always recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for a case like this.
