First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Tenant Appeal
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair rental price for a rented house after the landlord tried to raise the rent significantly. The tribunal considered the condition of the property and similar properties nearby before setting a new rent that reflects both the current state of the home and market rates.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market value reflecting the condition of the property.
📖 What the law says
This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve notices proposing increases in rent, with specific conditions regarding when these increases can take effect.
This section implies a covenant by the lessor to repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. The covenant also covers space heating and heating water installations.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy property, considering various defects and comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair market rent for an assured tenancy property, considering the condition of the property and comparables. The tenant appealed against a proposed increase in rent due to various defects and issues with the property.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference BIR/OOCS/MNR/2025/0827
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME] Tenant’s Representative
Landlord
c/o Belvoir Wednesbury
Landlord’s Address c/o 4 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Landlord’s Representative Belvoir Wednesbury
Date of Application
28th September 2025 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members [NAME] (Chairman) [NAME] of Decision
30th April 2026 Rent Determined £600.00 per calendar month
Date the new rent takes effect
21st October 2025
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION Background
1. On 2nd September 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £995.00 per month in place of the existing rent of £600.00 to take effect from 21st October 2025.
2. On 28th September 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 21st November 2016. The original term is not known. The rental period is understood to be monthly.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtains and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
5. None.
Liability for Council Tax
6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
7. None.
Inspection/Hearing
8. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
9. Based on the papers provided to it, the Tribunal understands that the property is a mid-terraced townhouse offering the following accommodation:
3
Ground Floor - lounge, kitchen and W.C.
First Floor: Three bedrooms and bathroom
Second Floor: Attic Room
Outside: Front and rear gardens.
Based on internet mapping the property is understood to have double glazing. The Tribunal understands that the property has central heating.
The Property is situated in an established residential area.
Evidence 10. Neither party completed the Tribunals Reply Forms. No written submissions were provided by the Landlord. Submissions were made by the Tenant in her original application.
11. The Tenant submits:
a) That there is a list of repairs required. They have been reported but no work has been done. b) There is a hole under the bath to the hallway ceiling. c) The rear door does not operate/lock properly. d) The back boiler has not worked since February 2023. There is therefore no central heating or hot water. e) There is a leak to the attic room causing damage to decoration and black mould on the chimney breast. f) The ground floor W.C is leaking.
12. The Tenant submitted that the repairs had been reported to the Local Authority Environmental Health Officer. Therefore, in the submission of the Tenant, the Landlord had failed to carry out their obligations under section 11 of the 1985 Act.
13. With regard to comparable evidence the Tenant submitted that there a range of properties at rents between £750.00 - £1,500.00 per month but that there was a similar house on the next road being offered at £800.00 per month. This was in the [POSTCODE] postcode.
Determination and Valuation 14. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the limited comparables provided by the Tenant, the Tribunal considers that the market
4
rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1,000.00 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties including having white goods and curtains provided by the Landlord.
15. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to reflect the condition of the property which we consider merits a substantial discount (particularly in respect of the lack of hot water or central heating):
a) Lack of central heating/hot water b) Hole to hall ceiling. c) Defective rear door. d) Leak to attic room.
16. The full valuation is shown below:
Market Rent
£1,000.00
Less a) Items given under a) above
280.00
b) Items given under b) above
25.00 c) Items given under c) above
45.00
d) Items given under a) above 50.00 £400.00 Market Rent £600.00
Decision 17. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £600.00 per month with effect from 21st October 2025. Undue Hardship 18. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
19. The Tenant has not asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case.
Chairman: [NAME]: 30th April 2026
5
APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Semi-Detached House
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £920 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,100 PCM for Birmingham Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,250 per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent for Redcar property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Fair Rent After Considering Property Condition
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- Rent should be set at a fair market value reflecting the property's condition.
- Rent must be justified by comparable rental values.
- Landlord's proposed rent increase must consider the property's condition and location.
- Rent assessment should take into account current market conditions and the physical state of the property.
- Adjustments to rent must be made based on environmental factors affecting the property's value.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the fair market rent for an assured tenancy at £600 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant appealed against a proposed increase in rent by their landlord.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal considered the condition of the property and comparables before setting a new rent that reflects both the current state of the home and market rates.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 s.13 and Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11 were considered in determining the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition of the property, including lack of heating and hot water, influenced the decision to set a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision supported the tenant's appeal as it resulted in a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Tenants can challenge unfair rent increases by presenting evidence of property defects and market comparables.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of repairs needed, condition issues like no heating or hot water, and comparable rental prices were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, either party can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal on points of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
