VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tenant's rent was assessed by the First-tier Tribunal based on current market conditions and the state of their flat. The rent was set at £705 per month, after adjusting for a broken bedroom window.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed based on current market conditions and the physical state of the property.

Topics

tenancyrent assessment

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 allows landlords to propose increases in rent for assured periodic tenancies, provided they follow a prescribed notice procedure. The notice must specify a new rent amount and a future start date for the increase, which must be at least two months after the notice is served.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

Under this act, landlords are obligated to maintain the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes. They must also ensure that installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation are kept in repair and working order. Additionally, landlords must maintain installations for space heating and heating water in the same condition.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Dudley, adjusting for property condition and comparable rents.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Dudley, adjusting from £725 to £705 pcm due to a broken window and property condition. The tribunal considered comparables and central location.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference BIR/OOCR/MNR/2025/0828

[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME] [COUNSEL] & [NAME]

Tenant’s Representative

Landlord

[APPELLANT]

Landlord’s [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Landlord’s [RESPONDENT] of Application

20th October 2025 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members Graham Freckelton FRICS (Chairman) Deputy District Judge Naomi Candlin Date of Decision 22nd April 2026

Rent Determined

£705.00 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

1st December 2025

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 8th October 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £725.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £675.00 pcm to take effect from 1st December 2025.

2. On 20th October 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 1st December 2024 for a term of six months. The rental period is monthly.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtains and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. None.

Liability for Council Tax

6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

7. None.

Inspection/Hearing

8. Neither party requested an inspection or oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

3

The Property

9. Based on the information provided to it the Tribunal understands that the Property is a first floor flat with no lift offering the following accommodation:

Lounge, Kitchen, One bedroom and bathroom.

Outside there is one parking space.

The Property is understood to have single glazed windows. There is understood to be central heating. Carpets, curtains and white goods are provided by the Landlord.

The Property is situated in the centre of Dudley.

Evidence

10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.

The Tenant.

The Tenant made the following comments:

a) Since the commencement of the tenancy there had been a broken window to the bedroom which resulted in noise pollution, draughts and a safety hazard.

The Landlord

The landlord submitted a copy of the inventory with photographs when the tenant moved in together with numerous comparables of various flats ranging in rental between £500.00 - £675.00 pcm.

Determination and Valuation

11. The Tribunal considers the comparables provided by the Landlord are relevant to this matter. This property is centrally situated and obviously some of the comparables were not in the town centre. However, the general level of rents in the Landlord’s comparables was lower than that proposed. The Tribunal is of the opinion that being centrally situated, this flat is likely to attract a slight premium over flats in more outlying areas.

12. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables provided by the Landlord, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the

4

order of £725.00 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to be let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties including having white goods and curtains provided by the landlord.

13. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) The broken window to the bedroom.

The full valuation is shown below:

Starting Rent

£725.00 pcm

Less a) Items given under a) above

£20.00

Market rent

£705.00 pcm

Undue hardship

12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

13. The Tenant has not asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case.

Decision

14. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £705.00 per calendar month with effect from 1st December 2025.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • Rent should be assessed based on current market conditions.
  • Rent should consider the physical state of the property.
  • Rent determination should involve the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber).
  • Rent adjustments should account for the property's condition and compliance with local licensing requirements.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Dudley to be £705 pcm.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved, with the First-tier Tribunal making the determination.

How did the court decide, and why?

The tribunal considered comparable rents and property condition, adjusting for a broken window to set the rent at £705 pcm.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The condition of the property, specifically a broken bedroom window, influenced the rent adjustment.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

For the tenant, as the rent was set slightly lower than proposed by the landlord.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone with an assured tenancy can have their rent assessed based on current market conditions and property condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparables of rental prices, inventory details, and photographs were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party may appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on points of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.