VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £920 PCM

Case No.

📌 In brief

In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set a new rental price of £920 per month for an assured tenancy in Winchelsea. The tribunal adjusted the landlord's proposed rent based on factors like noise from nearby properties and items provided by the tenant.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord's proposed increase in rent must be adjusted based on the property's condition and any environmental factors affecting its value.

Topics

tenancyrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve notices proposing increases in rent under specific conditions. These conditions include the minimum period after which the rent increase can take effect, which varies depending on the type of tenancy.

Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11

Under this section of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, there is an implied obligation on the part of the lessor to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, along with certain installations for utilities and heating, in good repair and working order.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Winchelsea, adjusting for environmental issues and tenant-provided items.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Winchelsea, adjusting the proposed £1,025 PCM to £920 PCM after considering environmental issues and tenant-provided items.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference

HAV/21UG/MNR/2025/0787

Property [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

Mr [COUNSEL]

Tenant’s [APPELLANT]

Landlord’s Address c/o [RESPONDENT]

Landlord’s [RESPONDENT] of Application

8th October 2025

Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members [NAME] [NAME] of Decision

23rd March 2026

Rent Determined

£920 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

14th November 2025

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 30th September 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,025 per calendar month(pcm) in place of the existing rent of £595 pcm to take effect from 14th November 2025.

2. On 8th October 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 14th September 2017 for a term of 6 months. The rental period is monthly.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. None

Liability for Council Tax

6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

7. None

Inspection/Hearing

8. Originally the Tribunal was to carry out an inspection of the property but was informed that the Tenant vacated the property on 30th January 2026. Accordingly, the Tribunal determined that it would not attempt to inspect the property. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered

3

this case based on the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

The Property

9. The Property is a first floor flat offering the following accommodation:

Living Room, kitchen, bedroom, bathroom and boiler room/box room.

Outside there is a Car space.

The Property benefits from central heating and double glazing.

The Property is situated in the Winchelsea Beach area, approximately 2.5 miles south of Rye and 10 miles north-east of Hastings.

Evidence

10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord’s Agent made submissions to the Tribunal.

The Tenant.

11. The Tenant made the following comments:

a) The only kitchen appliance provided was a cooker, and that he provided the curtains.

b) The Tenant referred to a number of environmental issues included noise from the Disco on a nearby holiday park, noise and smells from adjoining flats, low water pressure, infestation of slugs and traffic noise.

12. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant suggests that, referring to properties in the Hastings area, the property would achieve a rent of £745-£835 pcm if recarpeted and £850-£900 pcm with new double glazing and additional soundproofing.

The Landlord’s Agent

13. The Landlord’s Agent made the following comments:

a) The boxroom is large enough to be potentially used as a bedroom and that Hastings is not a comparable area to Winchelsea.

4

b) The flat is in overall very decent condition and that all windows have recently been repaired and made operational.

Determination and Valuation

14. Neither party provided evidence of actual lettings in the area.

15. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comments made by the parties, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1,000 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties including having white goods and curtains provided by the landlord.

16. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) Tenants provision of washing machine, fridge and curtains.

b) General ‘environmental’ issues.

The full valuation is shown below:

Starting Rent

£1,000 pcm

Less a) Items given under a) above

£30 b) Items given under b) above

£50

£80 pcm

Market rent

£920 pcm

Undue hardship

12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.

13. The Tenant has made no such application.

5

Decision

14. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £920 per calendar month with effect from 14th November 2025.

APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined a market rent of £920 per calendar month.
  • The Tribunal adjusted the rent downwards because the tenant provided a washing machine, fridge, and curtains.
  • The Tribunal considered the market rent for a modernised property in good order to be £1,000 pcm.
  • The new rent takes effect from 14th November 2025 as specified in the landlord's notice.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new market rent of £920 per month for an assured tenancy.

Who was involved?

A tenant and their landlord were involved in the case.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on evidence about environmental issues and items provided by the tenant.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 s.13 and Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11 were applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The environmental issues affecting the property's value were key to the decision.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

It was partially in favour of the tenant, as the rent was adjusted downward.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone facing a rent increase can argue about environmental issues and items provided by them to adjust the proposed rent.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence on property condition and comparable rental prices were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party may appeal based on points of law within 28 days.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.