VadeLab
Allowed in PartFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,100 PCM for Birmingham Property

Case No.

📌 In brief

A tribunal decided on the fair rental price for a Birmingham property after reviewing similar properties and considering the tenant's contributions to repairs and improvements. The new rent is set at £1,100 per month starting in March 2026.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord's proposed rent increase must be justified by comparable rental values and cannot cause undue hardship to the tenant.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determination

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.13

This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent, which must take effect at least two months after the notice is served. The exact timing depends on the type of tenancy, with specific rules for yearly tenancies and those lasting less than a month.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for a terraced house in Birmingham, considering comparables and tenant improvements.

📜 Headnote Official document

The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a terraced house in Great Barr, considering comparables and tenant improvements. The new rent of £1,100 per calendar month takes effect from March 2026.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed in Part

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

Case Reference BIR/00CN/MNR/2025/0746

[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

[NAME]

Tenant’s Representative

Landlord

[COUNSEL]

Landlord’s Address

Landlord’s Representative

Date of Application

17th June 2025 Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal Members [NAME] (Chairman) [NAME] of Decision

12th March 2026 Rent Determined £1,100.00 per calendar month

Date the new rent takes effect

12th March 2026

2

REASONS FOR THE DECISION

Background

1. On 30th May 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,200.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £750.00 pcm to take effect from 1st August 2025.

2. On 17th June 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

3. The assured tenancy commenced on 1st August 2021 for a term of twelve months. The rental period is monthly.

Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.

4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.

5. None.

Liability for Council Tax

6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.

Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.

7. None.

Inspection/Hearing

8. Neither party requested an inspection or an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

3

The Property

9. Based on the papers submitted to it the Tribunal understands that the property is a terraced house, offering the following accommodation:

Ground Floor – Two living rooms and kitchen.

First Floor – Three bedrooms and bathroom. A loft ladder from the landing leads to a boarded attic space which also houses the boiler.

Outside: Garden.

The Property benefits from central heating and double glazing.

The Property is situated in an established residential area within the Birmingham urban conurbation.

Evidence

10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.

The Tenant.

11. The Tenant made the following comments:

a) The kitchen window was faulty.

b) There was mould to the ceiling of bedrooms 1 and 2. Mould was also evident in the bathroom. It had been cleaned several times but recurred.

c) Carpets and curtains had been provided by the Landlord. The Tenant had provided the white goods.

d) The tenant had carried out repairs and improvements to the property including: 1) Replaced fence panels. 2) Replaced the bathroom light switch. 3) Repaired a leak to the W.C. 4) Regularly purchased and applied mould cleaner.

e) The gas fire has not worked for over 10 years.

f) The proposed increase of £450.00 pcm would have a significant impact on her.

4

12. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant had provided details as follows

a) [ADDRESS], Great Barr – a three-bedroom semi-detached house offered to rent at £1,095.00 pcm.

b) [ADDRESS], Birmingham – a modern three-bedroom town house offered to rent at £1,100.00 pcm.

c) [ADDRESS], Birmingham – a three-bedroom semi-detached house offered to rent at £1,150 pcm.

d) [ADDRESS], Birmingham and [ADDRESS], Birmingham – both semi- detached houses offered to rent at £1,200.00 and £1,100.00 pcm respectively.

The Landlord

13. The landlord submitted that the property had been extended to the rear and that although the gas fire was not working it had been disconnected. The fan and window to the bathroom were both working.

14. The following comparables were provided by the Landlord:

a) [ADDRESS], Birmingham – a three-bedroom town house offered to rent at £1,200.00pcm.

b) [ADDRESS], Birmingham – a three-bedroom end-terraced house offered to rent at £1,200.00 pcm.

c) [ADDRESS], Great Barr – a three-bedroom semi-detached house offered to rent at £1.175.00 pcm.

d) [ADDRESS], Great Barr – a three-bedroom semi-detached house offered to rent at £1,250.00 pcm.

Determination and Valuation

15. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables provided by the Landlord, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1,150.00 per calendar month. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties including having white goods and curtains provided by the landlord.

5

16. From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:

a) Improvements and fittings provided by the Tenant and for which they should not pay: fence panels, bathroom light switch and white goods.

The full valuation is shown below:

Starting Rent

£1,150.00 pcm

Less a) Items given under a) above

£50.00

Market rent

£1,100.00 pcm

Undue Hardship

17. Although the tenant has not specifically referred to ‘Hardship’, she has, in her submissions stated that the proposed increase will ‘impact her greatly’. The Tribunal therefore accepts this as a request to consider hardship.

18. The Landlord has not made any submission on this issue.

19. As a result of our decision the rent will increase by £350.00 pcm. The date specified in the Landlord’s Notice was 1st August 2025. On the basis of the evidence supplied by the Tenant, the Tribunal considers that for the increase to take effect from the date in the Landlord’s Notice would cause undue hardship and accordingly sets the starting date for the new rent as 12th March 2026.

Decision

20. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1,100.00 per calendar month with effect from 12th March 2026.

APPEAL PROVISIONS If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal accepted that the tenant's statement about the proposed increase having a significant impact was a request to consider hardship.
  • The Tribunal determined that the market rent for the property, if modernised and in good order, would be £1,150.00 per calendar month.
  • The Tribunal reduced the starting rent by £50.00 for improvements and fittings provided by the tenant, such as fence panels and white goods.
  • The Tribunal decided that the proposed rent increase taking effect from the landlord's notice date would cause undue hardship to the tenant.
  • The Tribunal set the new rent to take effect from a later date, 12th March 2026, to mitigate undue hardship for the tenant.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The tribunal determined that the fair market rent for a Birmingham property should be £1,100 pcm.

Who was involved?

A tenant and landlord in a rental dispute over proposed rent increase.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court considered comparable rental prices and the impact of the proposed rent on the tenant's ability to afford it.

Which laws or rules were applied?

Housing Act 1988 sections 13 & 14.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The tribunal considered whether the proposed increase would cause undue hardship for the tenant.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

For the tenant, as the rent increase was set lower than initially proposed and delayed to avoid hardship.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Tenants can challenge proposed rent increases by providing evidence of comparable rental prices and demonstrating undue hardship.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Evidence on comparable rental prices, property condition reports, and tenant's financial impact statements.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal within 28 days if based on a point of law.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.