Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy in Kibworth
📌 In brief
In this case, the First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for an assured tenancy in Kibworth at £1,065.00 per month after considering property condition and comparable rental values.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have a market rent set by the First-tier Tribunal based on the Housing Act 1988 sections 13 & 14.
📖 What the law says
This section applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, allowing landlords to serve a notice proposing an increase in rent. The notice must specify a new rent to take effect at the start of a new period of the tenancy, which must begin at least two months after the notice is served. There are additional conditions for when the rent can be increased again.
A tenant under an assured tenancy can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy, provided the rent is not pursuant to a previous determination under this section and more than six months have not elapsed since the beginning of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can challenge a new rent proposed in a notice under section 13(2) or 13A(2).
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for an assured tenancy in Kibworth, considering various factors including property condition and comparables.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for an assured tenancy based on comparables and property condition, setting a new rent of £1,065.00 pcm effective from August 1st.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference BIR/00FN/MNR/2025/0758
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
[NAME]
Tenant’s Representative
Landlord
[NAME] (Agent)
Landlord’s Address c/o 44 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Landlord’s [NAME] of Application 28th July 2025
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members Mr G S Freckelton FRICS (Chairman) [NAME] of Decision
13th March 2026
Rent Determined
£1,065.00 per calendar month Date the new rent takes effect 1st August 2025
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 30th June 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1,250.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £875.00 pcm to take effect from 1st August 2025.
2. On 28th July 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. Based on the Application Form, the Tribunal understands that the assured tenancy commenced in April 2010. The rental period is understood to be monthly.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
5. None
Liability for Council Tax
6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
7. None.
Inspection/Hearing
8. Neither party requested an inspection or an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
3
The Property
9. Based on the information provided the Tribunal understands that the property comprises of a terraced town house, offering the following accommodation:
Ground Floor – One living room, kitchen.
First Floor – Two double bedrooms, one single bedroom, bathroom with three- piece sanitary suite.
Outside: Gardens to front and rear. Driveway for vehicle parking.
The Property benefits from central heating and double glazing.
The Property is situated in Kibworth which is an attractive residential village within easy driving distance to Leicester.
Evidence
10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.
The Tenant.
The Tenant made the following comments:
a) Repairs were required to windows, external timbers and double-glazing panes. There was a crack to the rear door allowing ingress of water. There are broken soffits.
b) The kitchen was over 30 years old. The Landlord provided the cooker and fridge.
c) The bathroom had the original suite (believed to date from the 1990’s).
d) The tenant had carpeted the property and laid laminate floors as noted.
e) The general standard of insulation was poor.
f) All decorations had been completed by the tenant.
g) The tenant had improved the garden.
h) The proposed increase would place an unreasonable financial burden on her.
4
Photographs were provided confirming the various items referred to.
In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant provided details as follows:
a) A 3-bedroom semi-detached house at [ADDRESS], Kibworth offered for rent in July 2025 at £995.00 pcm.
b) A 4-bedroom semi-detached house on [ADDRESS], Kibworth offered at £1,250.00 pcm were also submitted.
The Landlord
The Landlord submitted that quotes had either been requested or works carried out in respect of the following:
a) Repair/replace broken gutter.
b) Check broken paving to the front of the property.
c) Repair to kitchen door strip.
d) Repairs to tap.
The following comparables were provided by the Landlord:
a) A 3-bedroom semi-detached house on [ADDRESS] offered at a rental of £1,350.00 pcm.
b) A 3-bedroom semi-detached house on [ADDRESS], Kibworth offered at a rental of £1,350.00 pcm.
c) A 3-bedroom detached house on [ADDRESS], Kibworth offered at a rental of £1,350.00 pcm.
d) A 3-bedroom link-detached house on The Lea, Kibworth, offered at a rental of £1,295.00 pcm.
Determination and Valuation
11. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, and the comparables provided by the Landlord, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property modernised and in good order would be in the order of £1,295.00 pcm. This is the rent we would expect the property to let for
5
in the open market if it was in the same general condition as the comparable properties including having white goods and curtains provided by the landlord.
From this level of rent, the Tribunal has made adjustments in relation to the following:
a) The unmodernised condition of the Property relative to the comparable properties: rotten timber windows, rear door and defective double glazing.
b) Issues with the condition of the Property which reduce its value including the condition of the kitchen and bathroom.
c) Improvements and fittings provided by the Tenant and for which they should not pay including carpets and floor coverings, upgrades to garden, some white goods and curtains.
d) The Tenant’s liability to decorate.
The full valuation is shown below:
Starting Rent
£1,295.00 pcm
Less a) Items given under a) above
£55.00 b) Items given under b) above
£50.00
c) Items given under c) above £60.00 d) Items given under d) above
£65.00 £230.00
Market rent
£1,065.00 pcm
Undue Hardship
12. The new rent takes effect from the date specified in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase unless that would cause undue hardship to the tenant. In cases of undue hardship, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix a later starting date up to the date a Tribunal makes its determination.
13. The Tenant has stated in her application that the increase proposed would place an undue financial burden on her. She has not specifically asked the Tribunal to fix a later starting date in this case. However, the Tribunal has considered the matter and determined that it will not fix a later starting date for the new rent in this case. The reasons for this are that the Tribunal has fixed a rent which is significantly lower than that proposed by the Landlord and no details have been
6
provided to the Tribunal of the Tenant’s financial circumstances or any submissions that the increase would cause ‘Undue Hardship’.
Decision
14. Therefore, the Tribunal determines the market rent at £1,065.00 per calendar month with effect from 1st August 2025, being the date on the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,100 PCM for Birmingham Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £920 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent for Redcar property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair and Licensing Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Redcar Property
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The rent should be set at a reasonable market rate.
- The rent should consider the property's condition and comparables.
- The rent should be fair and based on expert assessment.
- The rent should be determined by comparing properties in the same area.
- The landlord's proposed rent increase must not cause undue hardship.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal determined a new market rent of £1,065.00 pcm for the assured tenancy.
Who was involved?
A tenant and their landlord were involved in setting the rental price for an assured property.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal reviewed evidence on property condition and comparable rents to set a fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were used to determine the new rental price.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The condition and comparables of the property played a key role in setting the rent.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The tenant's request for a lower rent was partially granted, as the new rent is below what the landlord proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rental increase can seek a fair market assessment through the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Photographs and comparable rental information were important in determining the rent.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Either party may appeal to the Upper Tribunal on points of law within 28 days.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
