First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Redcar Property
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) decided on the fair market rent for a new build property in Redcar based on evidence provided by both parties and its own knowledge of rental values. The Tribunal set the rent at £975 per calendar month, effective from January 2026.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market rate based on comparable properties in the area.
📖 What the law says
This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve notices proposing increases in rent, with specific timing requirements for when these increases can take effect.
This section implies a covenant by the lessor to repair the structure and exterior of the dwelling house, including drains, gutters, and external pipes, as well as installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation. Additionally, the lessor must also repair and maintain installations for space heating and heating water.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a new build property in Redcar based on evidence provided by both parties and its own knowledge of rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined the market rent for a new build property in Redcar based on evidence provided by both parties and its own knowledge of rental values. The Tribunal set the rent at £975 per calendar month, effective from January 2026.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
MAN/00EE/MNR/2026/0027
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
[NAME] & [NAME]
Tenant’s Representative
Landlord
[APPELLANT] (Kirkleatham) [RESPONDENT] c/o [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Landlord’s [NAME] of Application
15 January 2026
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members JA Platt FRICS – Chair J Gittus MRICS
Date of Decision
23 April 2026
Rent Determined
£975.00 per calendar month
Date the new rent takes effect
20 January 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 19 November 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1085.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £1025.00 pcm to take effect from 20 January 2026.
2. On 15 January 2026, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 20 January 2025 for a term of 12 months. The rental period is monthly.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
5. £0
Liability for Council Tax
6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of the Property. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
7. None
Inspection/Hearing
8. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
3
The Property
9. The Property is a new build 3 bedroom semi-detached house, offering the following accommodation:
Living room, kitchen / diner, downstairs wc, 3 bedrooms (one en-suite), bathroom.
Outside: rear garden and car parking space.
The Property benefits from central heating and double glazing.
The Property is situated in a new build development of similar properties to the south west of Redcar. Redcar town centre with all amenities is around two miles to the north east.
Evidence
10. Both the Tenants and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.
The Tenants.
11. The Tenants provided evidence of 3 bedroom properties being offered for rent on the open market in the Redcar area at rents of £995 - £1025. These included two similar (possibly identical) properties being offered for rent by [NAME] on the same street / development at asking rents of £995 and £1025.
The Landlord
12. The Landlord provided evidence by way of a Rightmove Best Price Guide and a summary of rents being achieved at three 3 bedroom properties within their portfolio on the same development. Those rents being achieved were in the range £1085- £1100.
Determination and Valuation
13. We found the best price guide to be of limited assistance as it only provided details of properties being marketed by the Respondent and provided no information on the level of rents achieved. It did not reference either of the two properties being marketed by [NAME] identified by the tenants.
14. We also found the Respondent’s schedule of passing rents to be of limited assistance as it provided no tenancy commencement dates and did not differentiate between properties let on the open market and those where rent
4
increases had been agreed with sitting tenants. Two out of the three properties listed were detached and we did not consider them to be directly comparable.
15. At the date of the decision, [NAME] was offering at least two very comparable 3 bedroom properties to rent on the open market at a rent of £975.00 pcm, both having been reduced from £995.00 on 16 April 2026. We consider these to be direct comparables although there is no guarantee that level of rent will actually be achieved.
16. We do not consider there has been any marked reduction in the level of market rents in the Redcar area since January 2026 and consider the above mentioned properties reflect the realistic level of achievable asking rents at the valuation date.
17. Having regard to the evidence provided by the parties and relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Redcar area, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property in good condition to be in the region of £975.00 pcm.
18. As the property is modern and in good condition, it is not necessary to make any adjustments to this level of rent.
Decision
12. The Tribunal determines the market rent at £975.00 per calendar month with effect from 20 January 2026.
5
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets fair rent for Redcar property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,100 PCM for Birmingham Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £920 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Worcester Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy in Kibworth
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent and Adjusts Start Date Due to Undu…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair and Licensing Issues
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenants provided evidence of similar 3-bedroom properties being offered for rent in the area at lower prices.
- The tribunal found two very comparable 3-bedroom properties being offered for rent on the open market at a lower price.
- The tribunal's own expert knowledge of rental values in the area supported a lower market rent.
- The property's modern condition meant no adjustments were needed to the determined rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The First-tier Tribunal set the market rent for a new build property in Redcar at £975 per calendar month.
Who was involved?
A tenant and their landlord were involved, with both providing evidence on rental values.
How did the court decide, and why?
The Tribunal considered comparable properties and rental values to determine a fair market rent.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Sections 13 and 14 of the Housing Act 1988 were applied in setting the market rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The evidence provided by both parties on comparable properties and rental values was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, as it set a lower market rent than proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can seek a fair market rate based on comparable properties and rental values.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of comparable property rents and Rightmove Best Price Guides were important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
A party dissatisfied with the decision may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
