Tribunal sets fair rent for Redcar property
📌 In brief
A tenant applied to the First-tier Tribunal for determination of their rent after receiving an increase notice from the landlord. After reviewing evidence on comparable properties and rental values in Redcar, the tribunal decided on a fair market rent of £800 per month.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent set at a fair market rate based on comparable properties within the same area.
📖 What the law says
This section of the Housing Act 1988 applies to certain types of assured periodic tenancies, excluding relevant low-cost tenancies. It allows landlords to serve notices proposing increases in rent, with specific timing requirements for when these increases can take effect.
Under this section of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, there is an implied obligation for landlords to keep the structure and exterior of the dwelling-house, along with installations for water, gas, electricity, and sanitation, in repair and proper working order. This obligation also extends to installations for space heating and heating water.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the market rent for a modern semi-detached house in Redcar, considering evidence of comparable properties and rental values.
📜 Headnote Official document
The Tribunal determined the market rent of a semi-detached house in Redcar, considering evidence from both parties and comparable rental values. The rent was set at £800 pcm.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed in Part
© CROWN COPYRIGHT
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
Case Reference
MAN/00EE/MNR/2025/1086
[ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant
[NAME]
Tenant’s Representative
Landlord
[NAME]) [APPELLANT] c/o [RESPONDENT], [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]
Landlord’s Representative
Simple Life
Date of Application
17 December 2025
Type of Application Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal Members [NAME] – [NAME] of Decision
19 March 2026
Rent Determined
£800.00 per calendar month
Date the new rent takes effect
17 January 2026
2
REASONS FOR THE DECISION
Background
1. On 12 November 2025, the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £875.00 per calendar month (pcm) in place of the existing rent of £800.00 pcm to take effect from 17 January 2026.
2. On or around 17 December 2025, under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. The assured tenancy commenced on 17 January 2023 for a term of 12 months. The rental period is monthly.
Allocation of Repairs between Landlord and Tenant.
4. As per section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
Services Charges or furniture provided by Landlord (other than carpets and curtain and white goods specified below) and the costs relating to the same.
5. £0
Liability for Council Tax
6. The Tenant is responsible for the payment of Council Tax in respect of [NAME]. The rent determined is exclusive of Council Tax.
Any other terms of the tenancy taken into consideration in determining the rent.
7. None
Inspection/Hearing
8. Neither party requested an oral hearing. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.
3
[NAME]
9. [NAME] is a new build 2 bedroom semi-detached house, offering the following accommodation:
Living room, kitchen, downstairs wc, 2 bedrooms, bathroom, hall, open plan kitchen/lounge, one bedroom, and bathroom with full suite including shower.
Outside: rear garden and 2 car parking spaces.
[NAME] benefits from central heating and double glazing.
[NAME] is situated in a new build development of similar properties to the south west of Redcar. Redcar town centre with all amenities is around two miles to the north east.
Evidence
10. Both the Tenant and the Landlord returned the Tribunal’s Reply forms.
The Tenant.
11. The Tenant made the following comments:
a) “We have been tenants in this house since 2022 to which in 4 years the rent has increased from £650pcm to the new proposing amount of £875pcm
b) The upstairs bathroom lino flooring the glue used to stick it down has saturated through to the top of the lino giving the illusion of [NAME] coming through. However, when raised previously was told this is cosmetic and would not be repaired or replaced. After are an inspection the person inspecting [NAME] said the only option would be for us to raise a request to put fresh lino down and pay for ourselves however if and when it came to us moving out we would have to put the old flooring back down and leave it how we got it.
c) We had to previously buy extra paving slabs to put down in the back garden due to flooding which would go into the shared ally way. We however got permission to do this
d) When originally moved into the house in 2022 there was a big patch of grass missing to which we had to seed and soil ourselves to get it to a good quality again. Each year we are having to pay for more grass seed and soil to ensure the upkeep of the grass in the back garden.”
4
12. In terms of rental evidence, the Tenant made the following comments:
a. “Prices within a 3-5mile radius for a house of the same size do not exceed the rent increased the landlords are asking of us.
b. When speaking to our next door neighbours and other tenants/residents on the same street with the same size houses their rent is lower than the proposed increased amount of £875pcm and has been capped at a lower rate than this. Which would make other tenants in the same size house paying less than what we have been proposed.
c. The same size houses on the estate owned by the council are not this high in price per month”
The Landlord
13. The Landlord provided evidence by way of a Rightmove Best Price Guide and a summary of rents being achieved within their portfolio of 2 bedroom properties within the same estate. Those rents being achieved were in the range £875 - £970.
Determination and Valuation
14. We found the best price guide to be of limited assistance as it only provided details of properties being marketed by the Respondent. We also found the Respondent’s schedule of passing rents to be of limited assistance as it provided no tenancy commencement dates and did not differentiate between properties let on the open market and those where rent increases had been agreed with sitting tenants. It also appears to cherry pick the Respondents’ portfolio as rents determined by the Tribunal over the last 12 months do not appear to be shown.
15. Relying on its own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the Redcar area, the Tribunal considers that the market rental of the subject Property in good condition to be in the region of £800.00 pcm.
16. As [NAME] is modern and in good condition, it is not necessary to make any adjustments to this level of rent.
Decision
12. The Tribunal determines the market rent at £800.00 per calendar month with effect from 17 January 2026.
5
APPEAL PROVISIONS
If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on any point of law arising from this Decision. Prior to making such an appeal, an application must be made, in writing, to this Tribunal for permission to appeal. Any such application must be made within 28 days of the issue of this statement of reasons (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rules 2013) stating the grounds upon which it is intended to rely in the appeal.
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for HMO Room
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent at £1,100 PCM for Birmingham Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £920 PCM
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Worcester Flat
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent at £725 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy in Kibworth
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Redcar Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent and Adjusts Start Date Due to Undu…
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Disrepair and Licensing Issues
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the market rent.
- The property's modern condition meant no adjustments were needed to the determined market rent.
- The tenant is responsible for paying Council Tax, and the determined rent does not include this.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The tenant's claim about cosmetic flooring issues was not considered a factor for adjusting the rent.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The Tribunal set the new rent for the property at £800 pcm.
Who was involved?
A tenant and a landlord were involved in setting the rental price of a semi-detached house.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal reviewed evidence on comparable properties and set the rent based on fair market value.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 s.13 and Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 s.11 were considered in setting the rent.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The evidence on comparable rental values within Redcar played a key role in determining the fair market rate.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was partially in favour of the tenant, as it set a lower rent than proposed by the landlord.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rental increase can apply to the tribunal if they believe their rent is too high based on market rates.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of comparable properties and rental values within Redcar was crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Either party may appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) if there is a point of law at issue.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It's advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor when dealing with rental disputes.
