VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The Tribunal decided on a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy. They set the rent at £1,800 per month based on the property's condition and local rental values.

⚖️ Legal holding

A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and local rental values.

Topics

tenancy disputesrent determinations

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant with an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on the property's condition and local rental values. The application can be made if the rent has not been previously determined under this section and if more than six months have not passed since the start of the tenancy.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined a new rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and the property's state.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined a new rent of £1,800 per month for an assured periodic tenancy based on the property's condition and local rental values, effective from 20 October 2025.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AC/MNR/2025/0989

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 16 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tribunal Judge [NAME]

Landlord [NAME] 29 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [APPELLANT]

1. The rent is: £ 1,800 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 20 October 2025

*3. The amount included for services is

not applicable

Per

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced 20 July 2023

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly statutory periodic

7. Allocation of liability for repairs Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985

8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord None

9. Description of premises A two-bedroom terraced house consisting of a living room, a bathroom/WC and a kitchen

Chairman Tribunal Judge I Mohabir Date of Decision 27 January 2026

Case Reference

: LON/00AC/MNR/2025/0989

Property : 16 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT] [NAME]

Landlord : [APPELLANT] of application : 24 September 2025

Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent

sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act

1988

Tribunal

: Tribunal Judge [NAME] of Decision : 27 January 2026

Date of Extended Reasons

: 27 January 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,800 per calendar month with effect from 20 October 2025 ____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

EXTENDED REASONS

Background 1. On or about 12 September 2025 the Landlord served a notice under

Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of

£1,700 per month in place of the existing rent of £1,250 per month to

take effect from 20 October 2025 for the subject property 16 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE],

2. On or about 24 September 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.

Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the documentary evidence and the photographic evidence provided by the Landlord.

4. It appear that the property is a mid-terraced house of brick

construction under a tiled roof. There is a small front garden which is

overgrown and to the rear a long garden with a small patio.

Accommodation is comprised of: Ground Floor - Reception/Dining

Room, Kitchen. First Floor – Two Bedrooms, WC/Bathroom.

Evidence 5. On 2 December 2025 the Tribunal issued directions to the parties stating that the Tribunal would conduct a determination based on the written representations filed. The Tribunal also informed the parties that they could request a hearing. No such request has been received from either party.

6. The tenant did not file any written submissions. The evidence filed by the landlord consisted of a market appraisal guide prepared by her letting agent, [COMPANY], dated 6 January 2026 showing both asking and actual rents of comparable properties in the locality of the subject property. The landlord’s evidence included photographic evidence of the interior of the subject property and the garden.

Determination and Valuation 7. Having consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area of Barnet, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2,100 per calendar month. The Tribunal considered that the current liability of the tenant to pay Council Tax as part of the rent had an adverse effect on the market rent.

8. The property appears to be in overall good condition and with the benefit of double glazing, central heating and dated fixtures and fittings. The Tribunal, therefore, considered that a further deduction for the overall condition of the property was required.

Decision 9. Accordingly, the Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1,800 per calendar month.

10. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,800 per calendar month to take effect from 20 October 2025, this being the date as set out in the landlord’s Notice of Increase. The Tribunal was satisfied that a starting date of that specified in the Landlord’s notice would not cause the tenant undue hardship and there was no evidence of this before us.

Judge: Tribunal Judge Mohabir Date: 27 January 2026

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These extended reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. Any application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to determine the market rent.
  • The landlord's evidence, including a market appraisal guide and photographs, was considered by the Tribunal.
  • The property's overall good condition, double glazing, and central heating were factors in the rent determination.
  • The Tribunal made a deduction from the market rent due to the tenant's liability to pay Council Tax.
  • A further deduction was made for the overall condition of the property, despite it being generally good.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant did not provide any written arguments to support their case for a different rent.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The Tribunal set a new rent of £1,800 per month for an assured periodic tenancy.

Who was involved?

The decision involved a tenant and a landlord.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on the property's condition and local rental values.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 section 14 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The argument that mattered most was the comparison of the property's condition and local rental values.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation may seek a rent determination based on local rental values and the property's condition.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Photographic and documentary evidence of the property and local rental values were important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, decisions like this can be appealed to a higher court.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to get advice from a qualified solicitor for cases like this.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.