First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
📌 In brief
In this case, a tenant disagreed with their landlord's proposed increase in rent. After the matter went to the First-tier Tribunal, the rent was set at £1475 per month starting from November 2025 based on evidence of new lettings and market conditions.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed by the First-tier Tribunal under Section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 if they disagree with a landlord's proposed increase.
📖 What the law says
Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to the appropriate tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. However, an application cannot be made if the rent is already determined by a previous decision under this section or if more than six months have passed since the start of the tenancy. Additionally, a tenant can also challenge a new rent proposed by the landlord through a notice under sections 13(2) or 13A(2). The tribunal will then determine the rent based on what a willing landlord would expect to receive for letting the property in the open market.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy based on market conditions and new lettings.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal determined the rent for an assured periodic tenancy at £1475 per month, effective from November 2025. The decision was based on evidence of new lettings and market conditions.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AZ/MNR/2025/0997
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
[NAME]
Landlord [RESPONDENT] [NAME] 14 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME]
1. The rent is: £ 1475 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 12 November 2025
*3. The amount included for services is not applicable
Per
*4. Service charges are variable and are not included
5. Date assured tenancy commenced 21 September 2025
6. Length of the term or rental period monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs as per agreement
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord
9. Description of premises First floor flat in purpose built block comprising living room/ kitchen, bedroom and bath/wc
[NAME] of Decision 21 January 2026
(c)
FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AZ/MNR/2025/0997 Property : 10 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] Landlord : [APPELLANT] of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mrs [NAME] and venue of Hearing : 21 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1,475 per calendar month with effect from 21 November 2025 ____________________________________
2 Background 1. On 25 September 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £1675 per month in place of the existing rent of £1400 per month to take effect from 21 November 2025.
2. On 30 September 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
3. Directions were issued on 24 November 2025. Evidence 4. The landlord returned the reply form and confirmed that the tenant had moved out and did not see any point in proceeding. The flat had been re- let at £1475 per month.
5. No submissions were made by or on behalf of the tenant. Determination and Valuation 6. The best evidence is the new letting at £1475 per month.
Decision 14. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £1,475 be effective from 21 November 2025 in accordance with the date in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase. The determination is made because the tenant has not withdrawn her application.
Chairman: [NAME]: 21 January 2026
ANNEX - RIGHTS OF APPEAL I. If a party wishes to appeal this decision to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber), then a written application for permission must be made to the First-tier Tribunal at the Regional Office which has been dealing with the case. The application should be made on Form RP PTA available at
3 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/form-rp-pta-application-for- permission-to-appeal-a-decision-to-the-upper-tribunal-lands-chamber II. The application for permission to appeal must arrive at the Regional Office within 28 days after the Tribunal sends written reasons for the decision to the person making the application.
III. If the application is not made within the 28-day time limit, such application must include a request for an extension of time and the reason for not complying with the 28-day time limit; the Tribunal will then look at such reason(s) and decide whether to allow the application for permission to appeal to proceed, despite not being within the time limit.
IV. The application for permission to appeal must identify the decision of the Tribunal to which it relates (i.e. give the date, the property and the case number), state the grounds of appeal and state the result the party making the application is seeking. Please note that if you are seeking permission to appeal against a decision made by the Tribunal under the Rent Act 1977, the Housing Act 1988 or the Local Government and Housing Act 1989, this can only be on a point of law. Appendix Housing Act 1988 14 Determination of rent-by-rent assessment committee. (1)Where, under subsection (4) (a) of section 13, a tenant refers to a rent assessment committee a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the committee shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the committee consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates.
4 (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling- house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of joint tenants, at least one of them) did not quit. (4)In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985, but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1) (a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements….
5 (7)Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal … shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Adjusts Rent Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent at £900 PCM for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal sets rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Fair Market Rent After Tenant Improvements
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Open Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal sets £1350 monthly rent for assured periodic tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The tenant disputes the landlord's proposed rent increase.
- The tenant is entitled to have their rent assessed by a tribunal.
- The tribunal considers the condition of the property and any defects.
- Rent is set at a fair market rate based on comparable properties.
- Service charges are also subject to tribunal determination.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
The tribunal determined that the rent for an assured periodic tenancy should be set at £1475 per month.
Who was involved?
A tenant who disagreed with a proposed increase in rent and their landlord were involved.
How did the court decide, and why?
The tribunal decided based on evidence of new lettings and market conditions.
Which laws or rules were applied?
Housing Act 1988 Section 14 was applied to determine the rent.
What argument mattered most?
Evidence showing that a similar property had been newly rented at £1475 per month was crucial.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The tenant's initial application was not withdrawn, so the tribunal made a determination based on market conditions.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone facing a rent increase can refer the matter to the First-tier Tribunal if they disagree with the proposed amount.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Evidence of new lettings at comparable rates was important.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, decisions from the First-tier Tribunal can often be appealed to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber).
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is advisable to seek legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such matters.
