VadeLab
AllowedFirst-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber)·

Tribunal Sets Rent at £700 per Month for Assured Tenancy

Case No.

📌 In brief

The First-tier Tribunal decided that the fair market rent for the property should be £700 per month, starting from 1 August 2025. This decision was based on evidence comparing similar properties in the area.

⚖️ Legal holding

A landlord may reasonably expect to obtain £700 per month for the property in the open market.

Topics

rent determinationhousing act 1988

Provisions

📖 What the law says

Housing Act 1988 s.14

Under the Housing Act 1988, section 14 allows a tenant under an assured tenancy to apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under the tenancy. The tribunal then determines the rent at which the property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord. This determination considers the property's condition and comparable evidence.

Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.

📖 Technical summary

The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £700 per month, effective from 1 August 2025.

📜 Headnote Official document

The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £700 per month, effective from 1 August 2025, after considering comparable evidence and the property's condition. The decision was made under the Housing Act 1988.

📚 Full judgment Official document

OUTCOME: Allowed

MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911

Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination or Section 22 Determination)

Housing Act 1988 Section 14

Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

[NAME]

Landlord [RESPONDENT] 48 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant [NAME]

1. The rent is: £ 700 Per month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)

2. The date the decision takes effect is: 1 August 2025

*3. The amount included for services is/is

negligible/not applicable £0 Per month

*4. Service charges are variable and are not included

5. Date assured tenancy commenced May 2020

6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly

7. Allocation of liability for repairs As per the tenancy agreement.

8. Furniture provided by landlord or [NAME] wardrobes and bed.

9. Description of premises This is a large, converted house which is now a 7 bedroom HMO.

[NAME] of Decision 1 December 2025

(c)

FIRST-TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY) Case Reference : LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911 Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] Tenant : [NAME] [APPELLANT] Landlord : [APPELLANT]. Type of Application : Section 13 Housing Act 1988 Tribunal Members : Mrs [NAME] and venue of Consideration : 1 [ADDRESS], [POSTCODE] Date of Summary Reasons : 1 December 2025

_______________________________________________

DECISION

The Tribunal determines a rent of £700.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 August 2025. ____________________________________

SUMMARY REASONS

2 Background 1. On 28 June 2025 the Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 which proposed a new rent of £750.00 in place of the existing rent of £550 per month to take effect from 1 August 2025.

2. On 31 July 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent. The Tenant’s referral was received by the Tribunal on 31 July 2025. Inspection 3. Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties. Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and the Landlord. Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the parties and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £720 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to: The maintenance of the garden.

6. The full valuation is shown below:

per calendar month Market Rent

£[ADDRESS]

)

£20

£700

7. The Tribunal determines a rent of £700 per calendar month. Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a

3 willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £700 per calendar month. 9. The Tribunal directs the new rent of £700 to take effect on 1 August 2025, this being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.

Chairman: [NAME]: 1 December 2025

APPEAL PROVISIONS

These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision. If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any request for full reasons should be made within a month. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.

1

Case Reference

: LON/00AH/MNR/2025/0911

Property : [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]

Tenant

: [APPELLANT]

Landlord : [APPELLANT].

Date of Objection

: 31 July 2025

Type of Application

: Determination of a Market Rent Sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988

Tribunal

: Mrs [NAME] of Reasons

: 23 March 2026

_______________________________________________

DECISION AND REASONS

The Tribunal determines a rent of £700.00 per calendar month with effect from 1 August 2025.

____________________________________

© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023

REASONS

FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)

2 Background

1. By an application dated 31 July 2025, [APPELLANT], the tenant of [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE] (the subject property) referred to the First-tier Tribunal (the Tribunal) a notice of increase of rent served by the landlord under section 13 of the Housing Act 1988 (the 1988 Act).

2. The Landlord, [RESPONDENT]., served a notice proposing an increase in the rent. The notice proposed an increase in the rent from £550.00 per month to £750.00 per month. The notice was dated 28 June 2025 and proposed a starting date for the new rent of 1 August 2025.

3. Neither party requested an inspection and the Tribunal was satisfied one was not required. The Tribunal has considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties and its own knowledge and specialist expertise.

The Law

4. In accordance with the terms of section 14 of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal proceeded to determine the rent at which it considered that the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let on the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy.

5. In so doing the Tribunal, as required by section 14(2), ignored the effect on the rental value of the property of any relevant tenant's improvements as defined in sections 14(2) and (3) and any reduction in the value caused by a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. Section 14 is reproduced at the end of these reasons.

The evidence

Tenant’s Submissions

6. The Tenant provided written submissions stating that the garden cannot be used due to it being overgrown and containing bees. The Tenant also provided screenshots of other listings for sole rooms ranging from £599 to £699 per month.

7. The Tenant confirmed that a bed together with built-in wardrobes are provided as part of the tenancy.

Landlords’ Submissions

3

8. The Landlord provided details of the property confirming that it was a room within a 7-bed HMO with two bathrooms and three toilets.

9. The Landlord also provided links to other room listings demonstrating that £750 per month was the market rent and that on average a room in Croydon is £834 per month.

Determination and Valuation

10. The Tribunal initially needs to determine what rent the Landlord could reasonably be expected to obtain for the property in the open market if it were let today in the condition that is considered usual for such an open market letting. In doing this, the Tribunal will consider the rental value of the property but must not consider the personal circumstances of the Tenant, as that is not a factor envisaged by the Act.

11. Having considered the comparables provided by both parties together with consideration of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in good tenantable condition would be in the region of £720 per month for the subject property as of December 2025 (the time that the Notice of Intention was issued by the Landlord).

12. Next, the Tribunal considered if there were any elements in the subject property that needed to be considered and reflected via adjustments to the market rent. From this level of rent we have made adjustments in relation to the mould and no provision of central heating.

13. The full valuation is shown below:

Per month Market Rent

£720.[ADDRESS]

) £20

£20.00

£700.00

Hardship

14. Under section 14(7) of the 1988 Act, the Tribunal has a discretion to fix the starting date for the new rent from any point in time between the date set out in the notice of increase to the date that the rent is determined, if it appears to the Tribunal that the increase in rent would cause undue hardship to the tenant.

4 15. There were no submissions or evidence provided to the Tribunal substantiating a claim for hardship.

Decision

16. The Tribunal determine that the market rent for the subject property is £700 per month. This is effective from 1 August 2025 being the date specified on the Landlord’s notice.

Chairman: [NAME]: 23 March 2026

5 APPEAL PROVISIONS

If either party is dissatisfied with this decision, they may apply for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber). Any such application must be made within 28 days of this decision (regulation 52 (2) of The Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Property Chamber) Rule 2013. Any appeal in respect of the Housing Act 1988 should be on a point of law.

ANNEXE

Housing Act 1988

14.— Determination of rent by tribunal. (1) Where, under subsection (4)(a) of section 13 above, a tenant refers to the appropriate tribunal a notice under subsection (2) of that section, the appropriate tribunal shall determine the rent at which, subject to subsections (2) and (4) below, the appropriate tribunal consider that the dwelling-house concerned might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing landlord under an assured tenancy— (a) which is a periodic tenancy having the same periods as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; (b) which begins at the beginning of the new period specified in the notice; (c) the terms of which (other than relating to the amount of the rent) are the same as those of the tenancy to which the notice relates; and (d) in respect of which the same notices, if any, have been given under any of Grounds 1 to 5 of Schedule 2 to this Act, as have been given (or have effect as if given) in relation to the tenancy to which the notice relates. (2) In making a determination under this section, there shall be disregarded— (a) any effect on the rent attributable to the granting of a tenancy to a sitting tenant; (b) any increase in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a relevant improvement carried out by a person who at the time it was carried out was the tenant, if the improvement— (i) was carried out otherwise than in pursuance of an obligation to his immediate landlord, or (ii) was carried out pursuant to an obligation to his immediate landlord being an obligation which did not relate to the specific improvement concerned but arose by reference to consent given to the carrying out of that improvement; and (c) any reduction in the value of the dwelling-house attributable to a failure by the tenant to comply with any terms of the tenancy. (3) For the purposes of subsection (2)(b) above, in relation to a notice which is referred by a tenant as mentioned in subsection (1) above, an improvement is a relevant improvement if either it was carried out during the tenancy to which the notice relates or the following conditions are satisfied, namely— (a) that it was carried out not more than twenty-one years before the date of service of the notice; and (b) that, at all times during the period beginning when the improvement was carried out and ending on the date of service of the notice, the dwelling-house has been let under an assured tenancy; and (c) that, on the coming to an end of an assured tenancy at any time during that period, the tenant (or, in the case of [NAME], at least one of them) did not quit. (3A) In making a determination under this section in any case where under Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992 the landlord or a [NAME] is liable to pay council tax in respect of a hereditament (“the relevant hereditament”) of which the

6 dwelling-house forms part, the [appropriate tribunal] 5 shall have regard to the amount of council tax which, as at the date on which the notice under section 13(2) above was served, was set by the billing authority— (a) for the financial year in which that notice was served, and (b) for the category of dwellings within which the relevant hereditament fell on that date, but any discount or other reduction affecting the amount of council tax payable shall be disregarded. (3B) In subsection (3A) above— (a) “hereditament” means a dwelling within the meaning of Part I of the Local Government Finance Act 1992, (b) “billing authority” has the same meaning as in that Part of that Act, and (c) “category of dwellings” has the same meaning as in section 30(1) and (2) of that Act. (4) In this section “rent” does not include any service charge, within the meaning of section 18 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 , but, subject to that, includes any sums payable by the tenant to the landlord on account of the use of furniture [, in respect of council tax] 6 or for any of the matters referred to in subsection (1)(a) of that section, whether or not those sums are separate from the sums payable for the occupation of the dwelling-house concerned or are payable under separate agreements. (5) Where any rates in respect of the dwelling-house concerned are borne by the landlord or a [NAME], the [appropriate tribunal] 7 shall make their determination under this section as if the rates were not so borne. (6) In any case where— (a) the appropriate tribunal have before them at the same time the reference of a notice under section 6(2) above relating to a tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 6 reference”) and the reference of a notice under section 13(2) above relating to the same tenancy (in this subsection referred to as “the section 13 reference”), and (b) the date specified in the notice under section 6(2) above is not later than the first day of the new period specified in the notice under section 13(2) above, and (c) the appropriate tribunal propose to hear the two references together, the appropriate tribunal shall make a determination in relation to the section 6 reference before making their determination in relation to the section 13 reference and, accordingly, in such a case the reference in subsection (1)(c) above to the terms of the tenancy to which the notice relates shall be construed as a reference to those terms as varied by virtue of the determination made in relation to the section 6 reference. (7) Where a notice under section 13(2) above has been referred to the appropriate tribunal, then, unless the landlord and the tenant otherwise agree, the rent determined by the appropriate tribunal (subject, in a case where subsection (5) above applies, to the addition of the appropriate amount in respect of rates) shall be the rent under the tenancy with effect from the beginning of the new period specified in the notice or, if it appears to the appropriate tribunal that that would cause undue hardship to the tenant, with effect from such later date (not being later than the date the rent is determined) as the [NAME] may direct. (8) Nothing in this section requires the appropriate tribunal to continue with their determination of a rent for a dwelling-house if the landlord and tenant give notice in writing that they no longer require such a determination or if the tenancy has come to an end. (9) This section shall apply in relation to an assured shorthold tenancy as if in subsection (1) the reference to an assured tenancy were a reference to an assured shorthold tenancy.

📊 How courts decide similar cases

Among 12 similar decisions in this collection:

A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.

⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this

✅ Tends to be accepted

  • The Tribunal determined the market rent for the property to be £720 per month based on comparable evidence and its own expert knowledge.
  • An adjustment of £20 was made to the market rent due to issues with mould in the property.
  • A further adjustment of £20 was made because the property lacked central heating.
  • The new rent of £700 per month was to take effect from August 1, 2025, as specified in the landlord's notice.

❌ Tends to be rejected

  • The tenant's claim that the garden was unusable due to being overgrown and containing bees was not reflected in the final rent determination.
  • The tenant did not provide any evidence to support a claim for undue hardship, so the new rent's effective date was not postponed.

Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.

❓ Frequently asked questions

What did this decision decide?

The market rent for the property was set at £700 per month.

Who was involved?

The tenant and the landlord were involved.

How did the court decide, and why?

The court decided based on comparable evidence and the condition of the property.

Which laws or rules were applied?

The Housing Act 1988 was applied.

What was the argument that mattered most?

The comparable evidence showing the fair market rent was crucial.

Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?

The decision was for the tenant.

What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?

Someone in a similar situation can refer a rent increase to the Tribunal for a fair determination.

What evidence or documents mattered?

Comparative evidence of similar properties was important.

Can a decision like this be appealed?

Yes, either party can appeal the decision to the Upper Tribunal.

Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?

It is recommended to seek advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.

Official source: First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) headnote and full judgment reproduced from the court's public records. View on the official source ↗Summary, holding, technical summary and questions: produced by Artificial Intelligence based on the official headnote and judgment. These are VadeLab’s own material and are not the work of the Court.This decision was issued by the First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) and is reproduced from its published records. VadeLab is not affiliated with, and this page is not endorsed by, that court or tribunal.