First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Assured Tenancy
📌 In brief
The First-tier Tribunal decided on a fair market rent for a property under an assured tenancy. They set the rent at £1937.50 per month after considering various factors like improvements made by the tenant and the overall condition of the property.
⚖️ Legal holding
A tenant is entitled to a fair market rent for their property under an assured tenancy, as determined by the Tribunal.
📖 What the law says
Under this section, a tenant can apply to a tribunal to challenge the rent payable under their assured tenancy. The tribunal will then determine a fair market rent based on what a willing landlord would charge for a similar property under an assured tenancy.
Plain-English explanation — does not replace advice from a solicitor.
📖 Technical summary
The Tribunal determined a market rent for a property under an assured tenancy.
📜 Headnote Official document
The First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) determined a fair market rent of £1937.50 per calendar month for a property under an assured tenancy, adjusting for various factors such as tenant improvements and property condition.
📚 Full judgment Official document
OUTCOME: Allowed
1
Case Reference
: LON/00BC/MNR/2025/0967
Property : [ADDRESS], Ilford IG2 6A
Tenant
: [APPELLANT] [NAME] and [APPELLANT] [NAME]
Landlord : [RESPONDENT] of Objection : 10 August 2025
Type of Application : Determination of a Market Rent sections 13 & 14 of the Housing Act 1988
Tribunal
: [NAME] B [NAME] Valuer 0079475
Date of Summary Reasons
: 20 January 2026
_______________________________________________
DECISION
The Tribunal determines a rent of £1937.50 per calendar month with effect from12 September 2025. ____________________________________
© CROWN COPYRIGHT 2023
FIRST - TIER TRIBUNAL PROPERTY CHAMBER (RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY)
2
SUMMARY REASONS
Background 1. The Landlord served a notice under Section 13(2) of the Housing Act 1988 dated 12 August 2025 which proposed a new rent of £2500 in place of the existing rent of £2300 per month to take effect from 12 September 2025.
2. On 10 August 2025 under Section 13(4)(a) of the Housing Act 1988, the Tenant referred the Landlord’s notice proposing a new rent to the Tribunal for determination of a market rent.
Inspection 3. The Tribunal did not inspect the property but considered this case on the basis of the papers provided by the parties.
Evidence 4. The Tribunal has consideration of the written submissions provided by the Tenant and/the Landlord. There were written submissions from the parties. We have given weight to the comparable rental evidence offered by the Landlord and adjusted for property size.
Determination and Valuation 5. Having consideration of the comparable evidence proved by the Landlord and of our own expert, general knowledge of rental values in the area, we consider that the open market rent for the property in its current condition would be in the region of £2,500 per calendar month. From this level of rent we have made adjustments to reflect tenant improvements, tenant furniture and floor coverings, dilapidation and obsolescence at the property.
6. The full valuation is shown below:
3
Decision 8. The Tribunal therefore determined that the rent at which the subject property might reasonably be expected to be let in the open market by a willing Landlord under an assured tenancy was £1937.50 per calendar month.
9. The Tribunal directed the new rent of £1937.50 to take effect on 12 September 2025. This being the date as set out in the Landlord’s Notice of Increase.
Chairman: [NAME]: 20 January 2026
APPEAL PROVISIONS
You can only appeal if the First-tier Tribunal decision was wrong on one or more points of law and you must say why the First-tier Tribunal was wrong in law.
These summary reasons are provided to give the parties an indication as to how the Tribunal made its decision.
If either party wishes to appeal this decision, they should first make a request for full reasons and the details of how to appeal will be set out in the full reasons. Any subsequent application for permission to appeal should be made on Form RP PTA.
MR22 First-tier Tribunal – Property Chamber File Ref No. LON/00BC/MNR/2025/0967
Notice of the Tribunal Decision and Register of Rents under Assured Periodic Tenancies (Section 14 Determination)
Housing Act 1988 Section 14
Address of Premises The Tribunal members were [ADDRESS], Ilford IG2 6A
[NAME] [RESPONDENT] Valuer
Landlord [APPELLANT] 23 [ADDRESS] [POSTCODE]
Tenant [NAME] [APPELLANT]
1. The rent is: £ 1937.50
Per Month (excluding water rates and council tax but including any amounts in paras 3)
2. The date the decision takes effect is: 12 September 2025
*3. The amount included for services is/is
negligible/not applicable Nil Per Month
5. Date assured tenancy commenced August 2019
6. Length of the term or rental period Monthly
7. Allocation of liability for repairs In accordance with Tenancy Agreement terms
8. Furniture provided by landlord or superior landlord Fridge freezer, washing machine and cooker
9. Description of premises .A mid terraced 3 bedroomed house with garden in an established residential area of similar styled dwellings.
[NAME] of Decision 20 January 2026
📊 How courts decide similar cases
Among 11 similar decisions in this collection:
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent of £2,200 Per Month
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Reduces Rent Due to Property Defects
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Rent Determination for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) First-tier Tribunal Determines Fair Market Rent for Property
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Assured Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent for Statutory Periodic Tenancy
- First-tier Tribunal (Property Chamber) Tribunal Sets New Rent After Considering Tenant Improvements
A snapshot of this collection — not a prediction of your case's outcome.
⚖️ What tends to weigh in cases like this
✅ Tends to be accepted
- The Tribunal used comparable rental evidence provided by the landlord to determine the market rent.
- The Tribunal adjusted the market rent to account for improvements made by the tenant.
- The Tribunal considered the property's dilapidation and obsolescence when setting the rent.
- The Tribunal used its own expert knowledge of local rental values to assess the market rent.
❌ Tends to be rejected
- The landlord's proposed new rent of £2500 per month was not accepted by the Tribunal.
Patterns observed in similar cases in this collection — every case is unique.
❓ Frequently asked questions
What did this decision decide?
It set a fair market rent of £1937.50 per month for a property under an assured tenancy.
Who was involved?
The tenant and the landlord were involved in the dispute over the rent.
How did the court decide, and why?
The court decided based on comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property.
Which laws or rules were applied?
The Housing Act 1988 sections 13 and 14 were applied.
What was the argument that mattered most?
The comparable rental evidence and the condition of the property were the most important arguments.
Was the decision for or against the person who brought the case?
The decision was for the tenant, setting a lower rent than initially proposed.
What does this mean for someone in a similar situation?
Someone in a similar situation may also seek a fair market rent determination through the First-tier Tribunal.
What evidence or documents mattered?
Written submissions from both parties and comparable rental evidence were crucial.
Can a decision like this be appealed?
Yes, a decision like this can be appealed if there are errors in points of law.
Is it worth getting a solicitor for a case like this?
It is recommended to get legal advice from a qualified solicitor for such cases.
